Super Tuesday

1235712

  Comments


  • Huckabee is doing better than Romney.

    yea, go evangelicals! i don't know what this says about republicans. if i had no choice but to elect a republican, romney is a no brainer. i know mccain is left of the extreme right on certain issues, but i don't trust that guy any farther than i can throw his grumpy Bush loving ass.


    hillary is looking better than i expected. if she gets California i think obama is gonna have an uphill battle.

  • deejdeej 5,125 Posts
    Huckabee is doing better than Romney.

    yea, go evangelicals! i don't know what this says about republicans. if i had no choice but to elect a republican, romney is a no brainer. i know mccain is left of the extreme right on certain issues, but i don't trust that guy any farther than i can throw his grumpy Bush loving ass.


    hillary is looking better than i expected. if she gets California i think obama is gonna have an uphill battle.
    huckabee is looking for a vp nod or something, hes basically throwing romney under a bus

  • as vulgar as it is, it does reveal the possibility that sexism superscedes racial bias in a presidential candidate? dont know if i used the term supercede correctly but you know what i mean. anyhow i see a black/female/any other ethnicity as prime minister here in canada before america ever gets close to the same with their president, you guys(i mean your country as a whole) did kinda elect bush 2 terms in a row?!?!

    Ah, we already had a female PM. Not that she lasted long. But still...

    I totally forgot about that! but there's the proof. Canada for president!

    I can't think of a good female leader in world history.

    (THAT'S SEXIST!)

    seriously, someone help me out; I am stating objective fact: I can't think of one right now.

  • DORDOR Two Ron Toe 9,902 Posts
    as vulgar as it is, it does reveal the possibility that sexism superscedes racial bias in a presidential candidate? dont know if i used the term supercede correctly but you know what i mean. anyhow i see a black/female/any other ethnicity as prime minister here in canada before america ever gets close to the same with their president, you guys(i mean your country as a whole) did kinda elect bush 2 terms in a row?!?!

    Ah, we already had a female PM. Not that she lasted long. But still...

    I totally forgot about that! but there's the proof. Canada for president!

    I can't think of a good female leader in world history.

    (THAT'S SEXIST!)

    seriously, someone help me out; I am stating objective fact: I can't think of one right now.

    U Dunny. Thatcher ruled!

  • DORDOR Two Ron Toe 9,902 Posts
    PS- I'm joking on her ruling btw. But she did have a set of balls that made men scared to piss her off.

  • BILL KRISTOL: Look, the only people for Hillary Clinton are the Democratic establishment and white women. The Democratic establishment -- it would be crazy for the Democratic Party to follow an establishment that's led it to defeat year after year. White women are a problem, that's, you know -- we all live with that.

    (laughter)

    JUAN WILLIAMS (National Public Radio correspondent and Fox News contributor): Not me!

    HUME: Bill, for the record, I like white women.

    KRISTOL: I know, I shouldn't have said that.

    HAHAHA! I read that on salon. I love Juan Williams response, It's a good thing for Kristol Superbowl was happening that day.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts

    huckabee is looking for a vp nod or something, hes basically throwing romney under a bus

    I think Mit's done a pretty good job of wedging himself in there to begin with but yeah, so far,

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts

    I can't think of a good female leader in world history.

    (THAT'S SEXIST!)

    seriously, someone help me out; I am stating objective fact: I can't think of one right now.

    This says a lot more about you than it does about world history.


  • I can't think of a good female leader in world history.

    (THAT'S SEXIST!)

    seriously, someone help me out; I am stating objective fact: I can't think of one right now.

    This says a lot more about you than it does about world history.

    lol. how's that? I'd say given the extremely small pool of female leaders from which to choose a "good" one, it actually says more about world history than it says about anything else, i.e there's been pitfully few female leaders in world history.

    in any case, O, I am open to your suggestions.

  • SwayzeSwayze 14,705 Posts

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts

  • SwayzeSwayze 14,705 Posts

    I can't think of a good female leader in world history.

    (THAT'S SEXIST!)

    seriously, someone help me out; I am stating objective fact: I can't think of one right now.

    This says a lot more about you than it does about world history.

    lol. how's that? I'd say given the extremely small pool of female leaders from which to choose a "good" one, it actually says more about world history than it says about anything else, i.e there's been pitfully few female leaders in world history.

    in any case, O, I am open to your suggestions.

    Portia Miller kept the status quo in Jamaica for a while there, if that counts for anything. And Jamaica's economy is pretty volatile...

  • SwayzeSwayze 14,705 Posts

    I can't think of a good female leader in world history.

    (THAT'S SEXIST!)

    seriously, someone help me out; I am stating objective fact: I can't think of one right now.

    This says a lot more about you than it does about world history.

    lol. how's that? I'd say given the extremely small pool of female leaders from which to choose a "good" one, it actually says more about world history than it says about anything else, i.e there's been pitfully few female leaders in world history.

    in any case, O, I am open to your suggestions.

    Portia Miller kept the status quo in Jamaica for a while there, if that counts for anything. And Jamaica's economy is pretty volatile...

    oh yeah, Arroyo and Aquino in the Philippines.

  • SwayzeSwayze 14,705 Posts
    anyone else bugging that Idaho, home of White supremacy in America, is going nuts over Obama?

  • Glad my state picked the right candidate.



  • man you're not really presenting a strong argument for historically good female leadership with your posting of a fictional president. that's actually sorta fucked up.

  • RockadelicRockadelic Out Digging 13,993 Posts
    anyone else bugging that Idaho, home of White supremacy in America, is going nuts over Obama?

    Maybe some perceived stereotypes of white people based on media reports of a very vocal, very minority, far right fringe lunatic contingency will be dispelled this year.

  • HarveyCanalHarveyCanal "a distraction from my main thesis." 13,234 Posts
    also harvey needs to stfu cuz hes advocating for fuccking ron paul

    Actually, I'm advocating for some significant change and it just so happens that Paul is the only one really talking about that.

    And lately I've been seriously considering giving my vote to Obama. He's certainly presidential. I like the anti-war rhetoric he was spouting when I saw him speak last year. And I'm all for having the right black president.

    But anytime I've voted for a major party candidate, I've been burned badly. Bill Clinton was an especially hard pill to swallow in that in '92 when I saw him speak he sounded much like Obama does now...especially with the anti-war rhetoric. Yet as president, Clinton went on to bomb Baghdad anytime he damned well pleased.

    I very much want to believe Obama, but if he's really aligning himself with a bunch of One World, eugenicist scum...then Paul it is.

    At the very least, he's addressing how foul the IRS really is. And if you talk to anyone actually interested in change, withholding our collective tax dollars almost always ends up where that discussion leads. Paul cuts right to the chase, wishing to empower common citizens against a corrupt system that illegally takes advantage through brute power and brainwashing-levels of coersion.

    Meanwhile, Obama throws the word "change" around like a Nerf boomarang...and I've still yet to hear what any of his "change" would actually look like beyond a friendlier face at the podium.

  • catalistcatalist 1,373 Posts



    wow she looks slightly evil

  • HarveyCanalHarveyCanal "a distraction from my main thesis." 13,234 Posts
    anyone else bugging that Idaho, home of White supremacy in America, is going nuts over Obama?

    Ground zero for Clinton hatred.

  • I like the anti-war rhetoric he was spouting

  • Clinton went on to bomb Baghdad anytime he damned well pleased.

    please be serious.

  • SoulOnIceSoulOnIce 13,027 Posts
    Clinton went on to bomb Baghdad anytime he damned well pleased.

    please be serious.

    He's getting reality and Tom Clancy novels confused again.

  • HarveyCanalHarveyCanal "a distraction from my main thesis." 13,234 Posts
    Clinton went on to bomb Baghdad anytime he damned well pleased.

    please be serious.

    On June 26, 1993, Clinton bombed Baghdad in retaliation for an alleged but unproven Iraq plot to assassinate former President George Bush. Eight Iraqi civilians, including the distinguished Iraqi artist Layla al-Attar were killed in the raid, and 12 more were wounded. This kind of unilateral action in response to an unproven charge is a violation of international law. The legal excuse given by U.S. officials, which they relied on in justification of the bombing of Libya in 1986, is the right to self defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. But that Article requires that the response be to an immediate threat to the retaliating party, clearly not the case, and therefore a legal fraud.

  • anytime he damned well pleased

  • HarveyCanalHarveyCanal "a distraction from my main thesis." 13,234 Posts
    anytime he damned well pleased

    U.S. Attacks Baghdad for Four Days During Ramadan

    December 16-19, 1998

    Read up on your read ups...

    http://www.ccmep.org/usbombingwatch/1998.htm#ramadan

  • motown67motown67 4,513 Posts
    Early exit polls show Clinton winning California. That's it for Obama. He'll continue his campaign until the Democ. Convention, but he won't have the delegates to win.

  • I'm hoping the Calif. numbers will tighten up as more results come in. The news just said Alameda Co. polls are staying open till 10 if there's still a line of people waiting to vote.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    Early exit polls show Clinton winning California. That's it for Obama. He'll continue his campaign until the Democ. Convention, but he won't have the delegates to win.

    He won't? Isn't he only 10% behind Clinton?

  • Early exit polls show Clinton winning California. That's it for Obama. He'll continue his campaign until the Democ. Convention, but he won't have the delegates to win.

    What if he wins Texas and Pennsylvania?
Sign In or Register to comment.