Bidding to Remove Buy-It-Nows (eBay-r)
Reynaldo
6,054 Posts
Anyone do this as a strategic move?
Reynaldo
6,054 Posts
Comments
Rey: not sure what you mean by "strategic" - if I think a BIN price way over the top, I'll throw down a bid to get rid of it and hope it ends lower.
Like $190 start, BIN $200.
WTF? So I can afford 190 but will baulk at an extra 10?
FOOH
I only tactically bid like this the once. The item was a London Jazz 4 album. The seller had the auction start at 49, BIN at 55.
Ordinarily I would have paid the 55 and saved several days of angst, but I didn't like the twat (previous beef-R) and so bid 49 using a friend's account; and won at that price.
Why bid higher than the BIN price when you could just... duhhh, BIN?
Or did you mean something else???
http://cgi.ebay.com/Jazzberry-Patch-S-T-...%3A1%7C294%3A50
No diss to this person but I was like WTF!
The first 3-4 pages are 95% overpriced BINs that sit there for weeks or months, occasionally going down a few dollars.
It's turning ebay into Gemm, IMO.
Hey, thanks for the free advertising! It's listed at 199 with BIN at 199, because I want $199 for it, and not have it listed in the store items area. Hope that clears up your bafflement.
How is this "killing" eBay?
If it doesn't sell, then maybe the sellers might get the idea to lower them. If they don't, that's on them.
Isn't that how the record game is played?
It's a good move imo only when the person phucked up their listing.
I buy lots of South American records and in the old days I could get some cheap, some I paid $$$ for. Now it seems like all the dealers in certain countries (meaning 3-4 dealers) only post their stuff as inflated BINs, WAY more than these records have ever gone for in the past, in an effort to jack up the price. Yeah, they're not selling so much stuff, but virtually none of these guys do this as their only job, so it's not really hurting them.
How would my customers like it if I got together will all the other store owners in NYC and we agreed to jack up our prices across the board?
This is what I've been doing on a bunch of used gear recently and it's worked out 50/50. I wasn't bidding on anything that rare but with a raer that I really wanted, I might not want to risk it. Son.
of course its dumb, yet a lot of people are hoping to get it for less than BIN
but they're still ready to pay even more. also, BINs are usually set rather high
so it's more likely the auction is gonna end at a lower price that at a higher one.
lower final price means less money for the seller and obviously less money for eBay.
i'm talking from an eBay perspective here.. why not just let the BIN stay
until either the auction has ended or the highest bid is higher than BIN?