another eBay WTF?
dmac
472 Posts
Sarah Webster Fabio test pressing I like how he describes it as dusty...
dmac
472 Posts
Comments
Uh huh...wasn't this guy doing something similar recently?
The 7" re-issue is supposed to be out in a matter of weeks.
I do believe he did...
Dudes there getting mad het up, especially as the seller called out other folks for this very thing.
Shifty as fusk...
WHere's Fryer's board at these days? Their old URL doesn't work anymore.
There is nothing vague about his description.... It clearly says it is one of 5 test pressings from the upcoming release. Pretty obvious if you ask me. You can kind of tell by the writing on the label that it is new as well (ie: not faded at all).
You don't think that this:
...implies that what these people are bidding on is an old record (which would explain the price)?
ambiguous for sure
You getting a piece of the action with this???
No I don't think that implies it is an old record because after that bit he says: "this is one of five test pressings of the forthcoming re-release on tramp. a classic tune, available for the first time on 7""
I'm not sure how much clearer it could be? I don't personally know about the practices that this seller has had in the past , I get the feeling like there may be a personal issue you have with the seller which is clouding your judgment of his description?
Cosign. This dude might be a douche supreme but his description is pretty clear.
To spend money on an item like this is simply idiotic.
It's not a rare record if there are at least 500 copies going to get pressed up. I remember back in the day when Phillip from Desco pressed up a 45 and the smallest possible order with the pressing plant was 200 or 500 pieces, he then trashed all copies except of 12 and thus created an instantly rare and collectable record. it was a good laugh and all but I would have never paid even $50 for something like this.
Of course the whole "dust issue" is not only suspect but just plain and simple misleading. How can a test pressing that's only a few days old collect dust? Who would sell a dusty record, never mind how old without first cleaning it?
It's funny and I don't feel sorry for the muppet who bought this but as far as the seller is concerned, this still is a cheap bitch move of the slimier variety.
I don't know the seller outside of similar practices having been mentioned here before.
Dust? Has the seller never heard of a disc washer brush or other record cleaning brushes?
That alone would keep me from bidding .50c from the seller.
I can't see dust in the picture. That adds to me not wanting to bid with seller.
Warped, dusty, vg+, reissue.
Why are people bidding?
Are there so few rare records in the universe that people are forced to bid on stuff like this?
More likely none of those bids are serious.