Sony pursuing legal action against Gummy Soul for the Bizarre Tribe mix

LokoOneLokoOne 1,823 Posts
edited June 2013 in Strut Central
I got an email from Gummy Soul today stating that Sony has issued them a cease and desist letter over the Bizarre Tribe mix. Here's the open letter they wrote in response.

"BIZARRE TRIBE: ACCESS DENIED (AN OPEN LETTER TO SONY)






June 5th, 2013


Dear Sony Music,



Thanks for reaching out. The fact that our small independent label warranted the resources of your legal team speaks to our work ethic and we appreciate the validation.

In response to your copyright infringement claim over Gummy Soul???s Bizarre Tribe; A Quest To The Pharcyde by Amerigo Gazaway (???Bizarre Tribe???), understand the vast majority of the samples used to create Bizarre Tribe were not taken from the catalog of A Tribe Called Quest (???ATCQ???). What your diligence failed to uncover is that Gummy Soul is not in the business of merging one artist???s instrumentals with vocals of another. Had one of the six Sony attorneys copied in your email deemed it necessary to listen to Bizarre Tribe before pursuing legal action, you would know that our projects are much more nuanced.

To be clear, the re-orchestrated instrumentals on Bizarre Tribe were sourced from the original jazz, soul, and funk recordings SAMPLED by ATCQ, allowing Amerigo to create his own, distinct production within a similar framework. Given the brief and limited use of ATCQ material on Bizarre Tribe (around 2 minutes of material out of a 55 minute album), and the method by which our reinterpretations are created, it is clear that Amerigo???s effort is protected under the fair use exception of copyright infringement.

We would further add that the presence of documentary style sound-bites, interviews, and news clips included on Bizarre Tribe to provide a narrative of the group???s history and commentary on their work only further protects us under the fair use exception, undermines your claim against us, and provides a clearer distinction as to the uniqueness of what we do at Gummy Soul. As you know, Sony is no stranger to the fair use exception as you have relied on it many times yourselves. Most recently when Sony Pictures was accused of copyright infringement by the Estate of William Faulkner, a member of the Sony legal team stated:

???This is a frivolous lawsuit and we are confident we will prevail in defending it. There is no question this brief reference (10 words) to a quote from a public speech Faulkner gave constitutes fair use and any claim to the contrary is without merit.??? *The quote in question is actually a passage from Faulkner???s book, Requiem for a Nun.*

With the defense presented in your statement, either Gummy Soul and Sony Music are both protected under our shared interpretation of fair use, or you believe the law should apply differently to small, independent record labels than it does to giant, mega conglomerates like Sony Music.

As to your charge of offering this product for sale, we do not, and have never, sold the album in any capacity be it physical or digital. We bear no responsibility for the vinyl bootlegging of Bizarre Tribe, nor do we receive any monetary benefits from their sales. The majority of our digital products, including Bizarre Tribe, are offered free of cost and is stated as such on any platform for which we control and have made Bizarre Tribe available.

In that regard, it is worth noting that our tiny label, with limited budget and resources, has clearly demonstrated the existence of a market for our unique brand of deconstructed reinterpretations. As such, instead of repeating the industry???s history of perpetual catch-up while forward thinking start-ups like Gummy Soul find new and innovative ways to create art and leverage digital media to our advantage, take this opportunity to stop the war on artists like Amerigo and their pursuit of creative fulfillment by encouraging creative expression and alternative revenue streams for your artists.

If a shoestring label with no employees other than a label manager, the two artist co-founders and a part-time contributor were able to build a 60,000 person email list, earn over 100,000 in downloads, garner your attention and that of countless mainstream publications and marque music outlets with our unique projects, why not leverage our success to your benefit while helping to push a reasonable dialogue for copyright reform?

Gummy Soul would welcome the opportunity to work with Sony in a mutually beneficial capacity. In an effort to be proactive, we offer the following ???everyone wins??? model as a helpful starting place for you and the other industry powerhouses who repeatedly go after those that are shaping this industry???s future. Rather than wasting your resources on an expensive lawsuit, apply those resources to purchase the rights to Bizarre Tribe to distribute and promote the project yourselves. In doing so, you would effectively provide a solution where all parties, including Sony, the original sampled artist, and emerging artists like Amerigo would benefit.

While we have taken Bizarre Tribe down to avoid a merit-less and costly lawsuit, you should know that we have placed a copy of the album in the archives of the Center for Popular Music at Middle Tennessee State University. It will now be available indefinitely for research under ???fair use??? provisions, fully keeping with the Center???s mission ???to promote research and scholarship on American vernacular music and to foster an understanding of the nation???s diverse musical culture and its global reach.???



- Gummy Soul"

More info here:
http://gummysoul.com/

  Comments


  • tokyobeatstokyobeats 505 Posts
    Touch??

  • DocMcCoyDocMcCoy "Go and laugh in your own country!" 5,917 Posts
    tokyobeats said:
    Touch??

    Indeed. A very measured and classy response.

  • JimsterJimster Cruffiton.etsy.com 6,952 Posts
    The quality of the reply is commensurate with the quality of the music.

    Two shays.

  • Big_StacksBig_Stacks "I don't worry about hittin' power, cause I don't give 'em nuttin' to hit." 4,670 Posts
    J i m s t e r said:
    The quality of the reply is commensurate with the quality of the music.

    Two shays.



    Peace,

    Big Stacks from Kakalak

  • ppadilhappadilha 2,244 Posts
    that is a classy reply, I just hope they don't get buried under legal fees having to defend themselves in court. These media giants' MO these days is to bring on frivolous lawsuits not because they're right, but because they know they can crush a small company with the legal costs...

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts

  • dj_cityboydj_cityboy 1,477 Posts
    shuttin' em down...nice!

  • tokyobeatstokyobeats 505 Posts
    ppadilha said:
    that is a classy reply, I just hope they don't get buried under legal fees having to defend themselves in court. These media giants' MO these days is to bring on frivolous lawsuits not because they're right, but because they know they can crush a small company with the legal costs...

    they seem to only be supplying in a promotional capacity, with no affiliation with the physical release, they say..... I think they are in a pretty fine situation as far as not needing to worry about legal proceedings

  • Jonny_PaycheckJonny_Paycheck 17,825 Posts
    I doubt every sample on either original album was cleared... Sony is liable too

  • dj_cityboy said:
    shuttin' em down...nice!

    PETE ROCK REMIX

  • BeatChemistBeatChemist 1,465 Posts
    Love everything about this. Fuck you Sony.

    Tweed... I cannot look at your avatar!!! lol It seriously makes my head hurt.

  • I think it is a good response, but I imagine a judge doesn't care. All he/she has to hear is the ATCQ vocals and "interploitations" of the Low End Theory. Unfortunately, the judge will side with the big bad Sony Corp.

    But after the judge sees that Gummi never made any " real money" they will just ask them to stop producing anymore units.

  • Jonny_PaycheckJonny_Paycheck 17,825 Posts
    Actually the judge may likely find that Gummy has nonetheless benefitted from the release in a financial capacity despite the fact that it was freely given away. There is also a basic penalty for copyright infringement that has nothing to do with whether or not the infringer profited from it in any way.

    All of which sucks royally.

  • It was mostly distributed by free download right? That's how I got mine. I did see the vinyl too though. Wish I would've bought the LP now.

  • Jonny_PaycheckJonny_Paycheck 17,825 Posts
    Right, but what I'm saying is that courts have found in the past that simply because something is free does not mean that the creators did not benefit from it and that a price tag can be attached to that benefit.

  • hendravishendravis 689 Posts
    can anyone hook this up? i never heard it :(


  • hendravishendravis 689 Posts
    coo thanks.



    fusk sorny.
Sign In or Register to comment.