Options

11/2/2010 (Lamprey Eel is toast)

edited November 2010 in Strut Central
Just a little over 24 hours until the polls open on the east coast.

Come Tuesday evening I'll be sitting at the bar at the Antlers hotel, watching the returns/results from around the nation.

I plan to drink a lot of champagne.

As Flounder would say: "Oh boy this is gonna' be great!"
«13456

  Comments


  • nzshadownzshadow 5,518 Posts

  • JuniorJunior 4,853 Posts
    For a second there I thought someone was comparing a midterm election with a tragedy that resulted in well over one and a half thousand lives lost but then sanity kicked in and I realised no one could be that much of a bellend so it must instead be referring to this pulsating cheeky little number.



    BA DA DA BOOM BOOM BOOM

  • Options
    nzshadow said:

    Is that a photograph of Democrat party legislators on their way out Washington after having their asses booted from their Congressional seats by the American electorate? Nice! :lol:

  • DB_CooperDB_Cooper Manhatin' 7,823 Posts
    *yawn*

    Cool story bro.

  • Options
    DB_Cooper said:
    *yawn*

    Yeah, tomorrow's action is going to be a real snoozefest non-event, fo' sho'! :lol:

  • DB_CooperDB_Cooper Manhatin' 7,823 Posts
    No, no???we get it. You're Republican. Awesome. Next.

  • jleejlee 1,539 Posts
    http://www.economist.com/node/17361396?story_id=17361396

    Ideology is one thing. But if the tea-partiers do well next week, especially if the Republicans capture the House, they need to move past ideology into the realm of practical policy. This means having something serious to say about how actually to bring spending under control. To date, they have preferred breezy slogans. Will they cut into pensions and Medicare, and if so how? Will they accept that taming the deficit will require hikes in taxes as well as cuts in spending? Will they continue to oppose reflexively every measure of a Democratic administration, or have the courage to share responsibility for the painful decisions the times demand? It has been all too easy from the outside to conjure up a mythic America of limited government, sing hymns to the constitution and denounce the federal bureaucracy in all its forms. Once they are in government themselves, that gig will be over.

  • DB_Cooper said:
    No, no???we get it. You're An idiot that thinks Republicans give a damn about you. Unless you are an unborn fetus or millionaire, they dont care if you live or die. Awesome. Next.

  • RAJRAJ tenacious local 7,782 Posts
    I voted Democrat for 15 years and am a registered Democrat in Bucks County, but I've lost faith. All the Dems have done is raise my taxes and put them in these "programs" that don't do shit. So yeah... if they lose out, I won't be surprised.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    And in another 2-4 years, the pendulum will swing back the other way. Woohoo, two party system.

  • CosmoCosmo 9,768 Posts
    I remember...

  • Cosmo said:
    I remember...

  • DJ_EnkiDJ_Enki 6,473 Posts
    mannybolone said:
    And in another 2-4 years, the pendulum will swing back the other way. Woohoo, two party system.

    Don't you see? This is the SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION! The people are rising up against commie nazi socialist DemonCraps, forever casting them asunder! Obama's radicalism has awakened a sleeping giant that will never sleep again!

    /teabagger

  • Seriously - worst thread title ever.

  • SoulhawkSoulhawk 3,197 Posts
    gareth said:
    Seriously - worst thread title ever.

    I thought the BP oil spill was 'Obama's Katrina'???

    these wingnuts need to get their talking points straight

  • dayday 9,611 Posts
    lamprey eel said:

    DB_Cooper said:
    *yawn*

  • jaymackjaymack 5,199 Posts
    i notice new clowns here every day.

  • mannybolone said:
    And in another 24 years, the pendulum will swing back the other way. Woohoo, two party system.

    Fixed

  • Options
    So the Dems lose the House, keep the Senate, and we get two long years of weird teabaggers proposing insane bills that the Senate won't pass and Obama wouldn't sign even if they did.

    In other words, nothing. For two years the teabaggers have been whining non-stop but they've had no responsibility for anything. Now it's up to them to produce, and I don't think they're up to it because they're fucking nuts.

    Should be fun.

  • BobDesperado said:
    In other words, nothing.

    Subpoena power without judicial interference, bitches.

    EASTLAND V. UNITED STATES SERVICEMEN'S FUND, 421 U. S. 491 (1975).
    Read it. Learn it. Live it.

  • BrianBrian 7,618 Posts
    you mean more republicans get in office and more poor people die as a result of their policies JUST LIKE KATRINA?

  • CosmoCosmo 9,768 Posts
    PLEASE DON'T FEED THE TROLLS...

  • DORDOR Two Ron Toe 9,903 Posts
    Drudge is now posting on the strut?

  • ReynaldoReynaldo 6,054 Posts
    I think he meant Obama's WATERLOO.

  • Options
    Reynaldo said:
    I think he meant Obama's WATERLOO.

    Obama's Waterloo will be when he suffers the total humiliation of defeat when he loses to a challenger in his own party in the next Presidential primary. :lol:

  • BrianBrian 7,618 Posts
    i thought lamprey was a little better than that super hyper liberal guy guy from waxidermy but this is making it hard to decide who is worse

  • Options
    sabadabada said:
    BobDesperado said:
    In other words, nothing.

    Subpoena power without judicial interference, bitches.

    EASTLAND V. UNITED STATES SERVICEMEN'S FUND, 421 U. S. 491 (1975).
    Read it. Learn it. Live it.

    Oh, right, maybe someone got a blowjob and Michelle Bachmann can have orgasms of righteousness over the horror of it all.

  • SoulhawkSoulhawk 3,197 Posts
    Brian said:
    that super hyper liberal guy guy from waxidermy

    yeah, wonder what he's doing these days

    ;-)

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts
    jlee said:
    http://www.economist.com/node/17361396?story_id=17361396

    Ideology is one thing. But if the tea-partiers do well next week, especially if the Republicans capture the House, they need to move past ideology into the realm of practical policy. This means having something serious to say about how actually to bring spending under control. To date, they have preferred breezy slogans. Will they cut into pensions and Medicare, and if so how? Will they accept that taming the deficit will require hikes in taxes as well as cuts in spending? Will they continue to oppose reflexively every measure of a Democratic administration, or have the courage to share responsibility for the painful decisions the times demand? It has been all too easy from the outside to conjure up a mythic America of limited government, sing hymns to the constitution and denounce the federal bureaucracy in all its forms. Once they are in government themselves, that gig will be over.

    Not really.

    They have no interest in governing, or governance beyond cutting taxes and raising spending, for the wealthy, rich and uberrich.
    They have just come off 12 years of running things and are enjoying being downtrodden.

    So what we will see from them are corporate tax breaks, socialism for agri-biz, and other cronyism.
    That stuff will get little or no press.

    What will get lots of press will be legislation to outlaw the use of Sharia law in the US.
    Anti-immigrant laws such as AZ 1070.
    And other nonsense attacking Muslims, immigrants, Latinos, GLBT, and the poor.

    Anyone who opposes these laws will be Muslim or socialist or worse.

  • RockadelicRockadelic Out Digging 13,993 Posts
    LaserWolf said:
    jlee said:
    http://www.economist.com/node/17361396?story_id=17361396

    Ideology is one thing. But if the tea-partiers do well next week, especially if the Republicans capture the House, they need to move past ideology into the realm of practical policy. This means having something serious to say about how actually to bring spending under control. To date, they have preferred breezy slogans. Will they cut into pensions and Medicare, and if so how? Will they accept that taming the deficit will require hikes in taxes as well as cuts in spending? Will they continue to oppose reflexively every measure of a Democratic administration, or have the courage to share responsibility for the painful decisions the times demand? It has been all too easy from the outside to conjure up a mythic America of limited government, sing hymns to the constitution and denounce the federal bureaucracy in all its forms. Once they are in government themselves, that gig will be over.

    Not really.

    They have no interest in governing, or governance beyond cutting taxes and raising spending, for the wealthy, rich and uberrich.
    They have just come off 12 years of running things and are enjoying being downtrodden.

    So what we will see from them are corporate tax breaks, socialism for agri-biz, and other cronyism.
    That stuff will get little or no press.

    What will get lots of press will be legislation to outlaw the use of Sharia law in the US.
    Anti-immigrant laws such as AZ 1070.
    And other nonsense attacking Muslims, immigrants, Latinos, GLBT, and the poor.

    Anyone who opposes these laws will be Muslim or socialist or worse.

    Do you support the practice of Sharia Law in the U.S.??
Sign In or Register to comment.