Movies - The White Ribbon A Prophet
bassie
11,710 Posts
I finally saw The White Ribbon and really liked it.It was a very different type of film for Haneke on one hand, in look and feel more than subject. The social commentary was there as always, but more buried than his other films. If anything, it was just a really great story.At different points, it reminded me of Von Trier?s Europa, Visconti?s The Damned and any number of B&W evil children movies of the 50s.And I saw A Prophet yesterday which will be hard to beat as the best film of the year. http://www.aprophet.ca/
Comments
Have you seen it? What did you think?
I want to see it again.
Dress
However I loved The Beat That My Heart Skipped and have read a few interviews Audiard about the process he went through to make it and am going to raise myself out of my popcorn cinema slum to go watch it on the big screen. Glad to hear it lives up to expectations.
MOTHER was kinda meh to me. It had some gripping moments, but Memories of Murder did many of the same things better. Additionally, there's a very broad portrayal of a challenged person central to the film that just didn't work for me. Might be cultural-differences-related, but if the character was meant to be funny it really fell flat w/ me.
You know, it's challenging, but not overwhelming. There are some harsh moments and some very tense ones, too. But it is not an unrelenting movie that tears your guts out and/or has images that will haunt you for days.
I want to go see White Ribbon this week. Haneke is one of my favorites-- though I did skip the Funny Games remake-- so I'm really looking forward to it.
Yes. There are a few elements in the film that in the hands of a lesser director/editor/art director would be corny or fail altogether. Having said that, the acting really carries the film.
It is in no way like Hunger or Ghosts of the Civil Dead in which one has to endure cruel act after violent act and so on.
Thanks for the recommendation i just downloaded it.
Read My Lips? Let me know what you think...
I must say I have nothing but the lowest expectations for this but then I wasn't even a great fan of the original so probably not for me anyway.
I would highly recommend checking out the Fingers "remake" - it's definitely not just an updating of the story to modern days in Paris. It has a very distinctive energy all of its own and Romain Duris is absolutely outstanding in the Keitel role.
Thinking back on "The Prophet" the part where they hit the deer rings so true down here there's no wasting of good meat(here its goat though).
If anyone's casting an Ian Svenonius biopic, he is also a natural for that role.
I live in the block where they directed the scenes with the Asian girl, teaching him piano lessons. And everyday in the real life I have this dude (or maybe girl) somewhere on the building, who's practicing concerto flute, and constantly reminding me the movie!
Prophet was dope, as was White Ribbon. Have you watched Martyrs yet, or did you forget about it? How about Les 7 jours du talion? I think it's only played in Canada outside of a couple festivals. It's pretty brutal. I'm going to see you Sunday at the show, I can bring some treats....
Les 7 jours du talion, I need.
I guess I better get my torture and violence mindset up and running lol
Cool! - see you then.
For anyone interested, this insightful article gives an excellent overview of his work:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/oct/31/michael-haneke-films-hari-kunzru
I didn't enjoy it as much as "The Prophet" but it definitely was a unique approach for this type of film.
It was a interesting character study piece, even though she had her insecurities
she was very assured when it came to getting her way.In the end they made a good partnership.
Strange how they worked in that story of the parole officer killing his wife i felt it was random.
Yea, it's not as dynamic as A Prophet.
Well, I saw Martyrs.
It was worth watching and I really liked the way the story was arranged.
I realize it's a movie, but there were inconsistencies that bugged me.
SPOILERS
If Lucie's cuts were self-inflicted after all, how did she give herself cuts on her back? I get that they put that in to confuse how real the monster was, but it made no sense later.
When Anna finds the woman in basement, there is a shot where they are grasping hands. The captive has immaculate nails - clean, manicured and shapely. Malnutrition and general bloody abuse would make this impossible.
It was almost a throw-away line, but I think the filmmaker put it in there with a purpose...maybe to avoid the film being labelled as something they didn't want to take on...Mademoiselle speaks to Anna about how martyrdom isn't simply religious. Fine, but everything about "witnessing" and especially the experiment's obsession with the afterlife and what one experiences, etc., has to do with religion/spirituality. I am not sure why they wanted that line in there when everything that follows has just as much to do with transcendence as much as human willpower.
Movies like this, they work themselves into a corner. 20 minutes in, I am wondering how the f*ck are they going to even end this? It was all well and good and when they did the cosmos in Anna's eye....they lost me. Goofy.
But yea, it was good to see. The two leads were amazing to watch.
DO IT
maybe not quite movie of the year, but it's DAMN good.