If the powers that be in Tehran wanted to throw a fake election, they should of at least slow-played that schitt and made it less obvious, instead of calling Achmadinejad the landslide victor the day of the election.
But maybe this will be a good thing in the end and stoke the flames of revolution.
Twitter users were posting ???#CNNfail??? on thousands of tweets Saturday night saying that their coverage of important news like the Iranian elections were downplayed by the cable network.
Here are some of those tweets:
clickmomukhamo: OMG! Major developments in Iran yet CNN isn???t breaking into Larry King who???s interviewing some bikers! #cnnfail
lifeonqueen: CNN is screwing the pooch on this one - top story on web is Six Flags bankruptcy not Iran. Way to miss history CNN #CNNfail
geoffeighinger: RT @Elektracutie They should quit the news and just do travel brochures. #cnnfail
Why is there not much on the news about shit going down???
I don't understand the lack of coverage myself. It's unbelievable considering what is taking place over there. I've been looking for some news about it and came across Andrew Sullivan's blog which is doing a nice job of keeping me atop of the situation.
my Dad is over there and he sounds exhausted and vague and isn't saying much - I can't tell if it's because they are cut off from any real news or it's not smart to say too much or both. I am worried.
tehranbureau.com is a great site and has very good updates
Much more important than the demonstrations, which are a shock for Iran, but a report I heard that the security forces were going around arresting moderate officials in the government. Was unconfirmed, but it sounded like a coup if true. Also some reformist clerics have called the election a fraud. Thy are not part of the clerical leadership, but still an important development because they gave religious rulings to back their complaints.
If the powers that be in Tehran wanted to throw a fake election, they should of ....
taken a leaf out of old George W book.....
I feel for the Iranians...but its time Muslims of the world stood up and were counted, any western involvement will only justify the Iranian powers that be....
Mousavi is not the 'reformist' candidate that he has been depicted as. You simply don't get to run for president if you aren't a proven party man as the communists would say(out of 475 people who applied to run for president the mullahs allowed 4). Read a bit more about this guy mousavi's history, especially his conduct as prime minister in the iraq-iran war.
I'd urge people to read stuff coming from the press outfits in the region and not the western press. From what iv'e read at the BBC ect. they seem to have been swept up by the romantic idea of a popular uprising of a reformist movement against hardline reactionaries and the facts are being fitted to this narrative.
Sullivan was claiming the Atlantic website was under attack, anyone heard anything else about that? The site bassie was rec'ing above was down last night when I tried to check it out. Best to your dad btw bassie..
The superior blog coverage of this definitely seems like the nail in the coffin for the MSM.
lifeonqueen: CNN is screwing the pooch on this one - top story on web is Six Flags bankruptcy not Iran. Way to miss history CNN #CNNfail
Crazy thing is CNN can have international bureaus, 1000's of staff, hundreds of professional lifetime reporters and millions of dollars of equipment, and it seems like a lot of people will end up getting their news from the CNN twitter feed (right next to your downstairs neighbor, Ashton Kutcher, and Lady Gaga).
And regardless, in the end that CNN feed can still get scooped by someone who's a local on the scene with a cell phone. Mad irrelevant, although I'm not totally comfortable saying editors are obsolete.
I don't expect CNN to be fully in with everything they got. But shit... As late as 4AM today their main headline on the website was about the digital TV switchover with something about Ahmadinejad winning the election down the page.
It can lead some to think the main stream media doesn't want to show whats really going on in the country and needs Iran to always look thy hate america.
have you thought about how this situation plays itself out regularly throughout the world to this day?
n. korea, burma, tibet, xinjiang, etc....
I'm finally coming around to twitter and seeing its power, still can skip 99% of it though.
The problem with many of the social networks is 1) in developing countries like Iran, it's probably limited to a small minority of middle and upper class urbanites. 2) they can often be shut down by the government, and probably worse, be tracked to the source who can be punished.
Comments
peace, stein. . .
BREAKING. Norm Coleman claiming victory in Iran.
That is all.
Shit has written FRAUD all over it.
But maybe this will be a good thing in the end and stoke the flames of revolution.
MAIN STORY on http://www.cnn.com/
Riots at the FCC headquarters to be expected shortly.
I don't understand the lack of coverage myself. It's unbelievable considering what is taking place over there. I've been looking for some news about it and came across Andrew Sullivan's blog which is doing a nice job of keeping me atop of the situation.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/page/1/
Things are pretty heated over there and it's pretty much by main stream media in the US.
Is it because this doesn't portray Iran as unified, fundamental islamic extremist?
And they wonder why people are turning to blogs to get their news.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html
tehranbureau.com is a great site and has very good updates
Seems crazy over there. My uncle just came back a few weeks back.
Damn at 2 minutes in the crowd chases away a member of the secret police when he tries to stop the BBC reporter.
taken a leaf out of old George W book.....
I feel for the Iranians...but its time Muslims of the world stood up and were counted, any western involvement will only justify the Iranian powers that be....
I'd urge people to read stuff coming from the press outfits in the region and not the western press. From what iv'e read at the BBC ect. they seem to have been swept up by the romantic idea of a popular uprising of a reformist movement against hardline reactionaries and the facts are being fitted to this narrative.
Are folks watching this stuff?
@persiankiwi
@oxfordgirl
#iranelection
Word, there's a good up-to-date blog on HuffPo and Andrew Sullivan has been updating frequently.
Amazing stuff...
Been following those as well.
Interesting read regarding the elections among other current Iran-related issues
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/6/15/iran_in_turmoil_after_disputed_presidential
The superior blog coverage of this definitely seems like the nail in the coffin for the MSM.
Crazy how twitter made cnn look useless.
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=cnnfail
http://cnnfail.com/
You're right about the MSM though. So irrelevant right now.
I was hoping to catch a feed for the Obama presser on CNN.com, they didn't even have that last I checked.
And regardless, in the end that CNN feed can still get scooped by someone who's a local on the scene with a cell phone. Mad irrelevant, although I'm not totally comfortable saying editors are obsolete.
It can lead some to think the main stream media doesn't want to show whats really going on in the country and needs Iran to always look thy hate america.
n. korea, burma, tibet, xinjiang, etc....
I'm finally coming around to twitter and seeing its power, still can skip 99% of it though.
Yeah, I was just looking at those right this second. WOW
Number 17 and 18 blew my face off.
The problem with many of the social networks is 1) in developing countries like Iran, it's probably limited to a small minority of middle and upper class urbanites. 2) they can often be shut down by the government, and probably worse, be tracked to the source who can be punished.