The real question is - what do they do now? The law may not want them to be together, but what will they do now? They did not grow up as siblings, so that relationship is not in place, and if they don't have babies...is it the biology alone that is problematic (w/o babies in the picture)? I mean if they never lived/grew up together as family, what are they supposed to do about loving each other as adults?
The real question is - what do they do now? The law may not want them to be together, but what will they do now? They did not grow up as siblings, so that relationship is not in place, and if they don't have babies...is it the biology alone that is problematic (w/o babies in the picture)? I mean if they never lived/grew up together as family, what are they supposed to do about loving each other as adults?
I don't know why but that sounds perfect if you read it in that off voice from the "Lord of the rings" movie.
The real question is - what do they do now? The law may not want them to be together, but what will they do now? They did not grow up as siblings, so that relationship is not in place, and if they don't have babies...is it the biology alone that is problematic (w/o babies in the picture)? I mean if they never lived/grew up together as family, what are they supposed to do about loving each other as adults?
I don't know why but that sounds perfect if you read it in that off voice from the "Lord of the rings" movie.
The real question is - what do they do now? The law may not want them to be together, but what will they do now? They did not grow up as siblings, so that relationship is not in place, and if they don't have babies...is it the biology alone that is problematic (w/o babies in the picture)? I mean if they never lived/grew up together as family, what are they supposed to do about loving each other as adults?
I don't know why but that sounds perfect if you read it in that off voice from the "Lord of the rings" movie.
The real question is - what do they do now? The law may not want them to be together, but what will they do now? They did not grow up as siblings, so that relationship is not in place, and if they don't have babies...is it the biology alone that is problematic (w/o babies in the picture)? I mean if they never lived/grew up together as family, what are they supposed to do about loving each other as adults?
If I bumped into a female version of myself at the clurb, I prolly tap that ass.
This all depends in what part of Britain the couple live in anyway. There are a few villages near where I grew up where 'keeping it in the family seemed to be considered the right thing to do.
If I bumped into a female version of myself at the clurb, I prolly tap that ass.
This all depends in what part of Britain the couple live in anyway. There are a few villages near where I grew up where 'keeping it in the family seemed to be considered the right thing to do.
what?!!!
that stuff still goes down really? I dont even think its anywhere near acceptable in even the most rural parts of america.
That really sucks for the twins though. Its like a lifetime of being grossed out hitting you all at the same time.
If I bumped into a female version of myself at the clurb, I prolly tap that ass.
This all depends in what part of Britain the couple live in anyway. There are a few villages near where I grew up where 'keeping it in the family seemed to be considered the right thing to do.
what?!!!
that stuff still goes down really? I dont even think its anywhere near acceptable in even the most rural parts of america.
That really sucks for the twins though. Its like a lifetime of being grossed out hitting you all at the same time.
Some slight exaggeration for comic effect but I've certainly met people who 'know' their cousins pretty intimately. IT's funny how recently certain parts of society glossed over this sort of thing - a friend of mine found out not that long ago that her great grandparents were brother and sister.
Assuming your brain is still functioning like the well-oiled piece of precision engineering it is, your response would, I trust, be: "That's a wind-up if ever I heard one. Think about it for a minute - you mean these two meet by accident, discover not only that they were both adopted but were born on exactly the same day in exactly the same town, and still never pause to wonder whether they might be related? Pull the other one. What did it say on their birth certificates?"
Assuming your brain is still functioning like the well-oiled piece of precision engineering it is, your response would, I trust, be: "That's a wind-up if ever I heard one. Think about it for a minute - you mean these two meet by accident, discover not only that they were both adopted but were born on exactly the same day in exactly the same town[/b], and still never pause to wonder whether they might be related? Pull the other one. What did it say on their birth certificates?"
I guess all this info is accurate/available to UK folks who are adopted?
Still, better it not be true than the other way around.
Assuming your brain is still functioning like the well-oiled piece of precision engineering it is, your response would, I trust, be: "That's a wind-up if ever I heard one. Think about it for a minute - you mean these two meet by accident, discover not only that they were both adopted but were born on exactly the same day in exactly the same town[/b], and still never pause to wonder whether they might be related? Pull the other one. What did it say on their birth certificates?"
I guess all this info is accurate/available to UK folks who are adopted?
Still, better it not be true than the other way around.
I'm adopted. I don't know my biological family's last name. Being born on the same day wouldn't raise any flag for me, except for that astrological love match ish (Aries & Aries couples are supposed to be bad news). Also, not everyone who's adopted knows that they're adopted. Remember when Skippy on Family Ties found out he was adpoted? Parents aren't always forthcoming with this kind of thing. I think its next to impossible that this is real, but there are circumstances in which this could go down.
If I bumped into a female version of myself at the clurb, I prolly tap that ass.
This all depends in what part of Britain the couple live in anyway. There are a few villages near where I grew up where 'keeping it in the family seemed to be considered the right thing to do.
what?!!!
that stuff still goes down really? I dont even think its anywhere near acceptable in even the most rural parts of america.
That really sucks for the twins though. Its like a lifetime of being grossed out hitting you all at the same time.
Some slight exaggeration for comic effect but I've certainly met people who 'know' their cousins pretty intimately. IT's funny how recently certain parts of society glossed over this sort of thing - a friend of mine found out not that long ago that her great grandparents were brother and sister.
first cousins? uber gross.
Pretty sure that its been gross for a least a century too.
Comments
Oh, ok.
The statement can just stand on its own then. I'm sure you'll find a way to prove me right somewhere down the line!
or they might have come out like Fatback.
huh?
The law may not want them to be together, but what will they do now?
They did not grow up as siblings, so that relationship is not in place, and if they don't have babies...is it the biology alone that is problematic (w/o babies in the picture)? I mean if they never lived/grew up together as family, what are they supposed to do about loving each other as adults?
Ari banned himself. He has the only two copies.
I don't know why but that sounds perfect if you read it in that off voice from the "Lord of the rings" movie.
Now I kinda wish I had seen the movie.
psych collectros?
dude on the left look like one of those weird club boys that appear on SS from time to time. Were they hungarian or something?
That thread might be lost, but his music career is still taking off.
Matter of fact, he's got a full sold out tour with Northern States backing this spring. The best is yet to come...
You know all them Hobbits got to be related.
See?
...as in there is a secret record that we both love?
But really, this is all just an episode of Maury or the Montell Jordan show gone wrong.
Don't worry, we are keeping it on the low.
This all depends in what part of Britain the couple live in anyway. There are a few villages near where I grew up where 'keeping it in the family seemed to be considered the right thing to do.
what?!!!
that stuff still goes down really? I dont even think its anywhere near acceptable in even the most rural parts of america.
That really sucks for the twins though. Its like a lifetime of being grossed out hitting you all at the same time.
Some slight exaggeration for comic effect but I've certainly met people who 'know' their cousins pretty intimately. IT's funny how recently certain parts of society glossed over this sort of thing - a friend of mine found out not that long ago that her great grandparents were brother and sister.
I guess all this info is accurate/available to UK folks who are adopted?
Still, better it not be true than the other way around.
I'm adopted. I don't know my biological family's last name. Being born on the same day wouldn't raise any flag for me, except for that astrological love match ish (Aries & Aries couples are supposed to be bad news). Also, not everyone who's adopted knows that they're adopted. Remember when Skippy on Family Ties found out he was adpoted? Parents aren't always forthcoming with this kind of thing. I think its next to impossible that this is real, but there are circumstances in which this could go down.
first cousins? uber gross.
Pretty sure that its been gross for a least a century too.
dude who are you to impose your Western values on others?
just kidding.