it doesn't make me racist to think he bought his aquittal... civil court found him guilty by the way. same with blake. obviously i wasn't on the jury, or privy to that evidence, but from the information that was available to the public/media, both those guys looked like the had blood on their hands.
What are you, some kind of lone nut? Surely you're part of a small minority of people who share this opinion.
rey, your stance is exactly the same as the defense attorney's...
common sense tells a diffent story.
yeah...common sense...something those people,those tax paying,law abiding,americans on the jury didn't have ........white common sense...
that's too bad, ed. it doesn't make me racist to think he bought his aquittal... civil court found him guilty by the way. same with blake. obviously i wasn't on the jury, or privy to that evidence, but from the information that was available to the public/media, both those guys looked like they had blood on their hands.
I believe there is a different standard of proof for criminal courts and civil courts. In order to be convicted in criminal court you are required to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. However, in civil courts, the standard of proof is "preponderance of the evidence". It's really not worth comparing the two verdicts.
Juror 199 (Seat 1): born in Jamaica.[/b] He is of mixed Asian and black descent
Juror 341(Seat 2): A white woman
Juror 186 (Seat 3): A white male
Juror 294 (Seat 4): White woman
Juror 266 (Seat 5): A white woman
Juror 257 (Seat 6): A Hispanic woman
Juror 333 (Seat 7): A black grandmother [/b]She told attorneys she felt sympathy for Fred Goldman, the father of murder victim Ronald Goldman, .....She also said, "Celebrities are human beings, just as likely to kill as any other person." Her husband was a parole officer for the California Youth Authority. She said she still trusts law enforcement. Her brother-in-law was killed by a robber during a holdup at the liquor store he owned.
juror (Seat 8): A man in his 40s believed to be of Middle Eastern descent.
Juror 326 (Seat 9): A white man
Juror 400 (Seat 10): A white female
Juror 88 (Seat 11): A white woman Juror 227 (Seat 12): A white man
for the record ...i really dont give a shit about Juice's innocence or guilt nor do i pretend to know if he is guilty or innocent......if anyone thinks dude is guilty thats fine with me but when people attack the jury's intelligence or get all ass hurt because OJ is playing golf and not in jail it is very,very,very bothersome...........i really dont have an opinion about the graemlin either so i'll back away from this thread
he was not guilty in criminal court, but was guilty in civil court right?
for wrongfull death wasn't it?
someone thought he was
The vast majority of people--including people who celebrated his aquittal--think he did that shit. The general consensus is that the LAPD framed a guilty man and that guilty though he may be, the PD's actions meant he had to be acquitted.
People don't have a good memory about this case. Here's the deal, Ar* can attest to my memory skills:
After cops found Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, they took a blood sample from OJ. The amount was X. When it arrived at the lab, it was Y (I don't remember the exact amounts, but I wanna say it went from 7pointsomething to 5pointsomething). The difference between amounts was enough so that officers could have "strengthened" the case by dabbling a little here and there. It wasn't about Fuhrman, bloody gloves, or chipping golf balls that got the Juice loose. It was about the cops tampering with/strengthening the evidence making this case have reasonable doubt, as little of it as there may have been. I celebrated his acquittal because justice was served, reasonable doubt existed. If he was found guilty, then I would be concerned about the court system, criminal trials and jury process. You can't run a criminal justice system by "probably guilty."
This is my 2c, and I encourage debate or flaming all you want. Peace T.N.
I was playing golf at a public course in LA, right after OJ lost the civil trail. I noticed he was behind my group and then later on, one of his shots landed like two feet from me in the woods. No fore, or nothing! So I picked up his ball, which I still have.
He may or may not have done what he did, but his golf etiquette is shitty.
He was in his limo on the way to LAX at the time of the murders. Nicoles parents even said so in their original statement to the cops. The cops made them change it.
the real killer is on the loose to this day, ojs innocence during that trial was as bright as the sun...not for 1 second did he seem like he had a reason or anything to do with the murders. oj is truly sad that since nicoles murder...he could no longer beat her ass.
he was not guilty in criminal court, but was guilty in civil court right?
for wrongfull death wasn't it?
someone thought he was
The vast majority of people--including people who celebrated his aquittal--think he did that shit. The general consensus is that the LAPD framed a guilty man and that guilty though he may be, the PD's actions meant he had to be acquitted.
Comments
What are you, some kind of lone nut? Surely you're part of a small minority of people who share this opinion.
If anyone thinks that DNA evidence is foolproof need only do a google search on: Houston Crime Lab DNA
I even did it for you...
I believe there is a different standard of proof for criminal courts and civil courts. In order to be convicted in criminal court you are required to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. However, in civil courts, the standard of proof is "preponderance of the evidence". It's really not worth comparing the two verdicts.
OJ in his Bruno Maglis BEFORE the murders took place.The same shoes OJ denied owning.
I can't believe I'm posting shit about OJ. I'm gonna go ahead and vomit now.
Jurors in the Simpson Civil Trial[/b]
Juror 199 (Seat 1): born in Jamaica.[/b] He is of mixed Asian and black descent
Juror 341(Seat 2): A white woman
Juror 186 (Seat 3): A white male
Juror 294 (Seat 4): White woman
Juror 266 (Seat 5): A white woman
Juror 257 (Seat 6): A Hispanic woman
Juror 333 (Seat 7): A black grandmother [/b]She told attorneys she felt sympathy for Fred Goldman, the father of murder victim Ronald Goldman, .....She also said, "Celebrities are human beings, just as likely to kill as any other person." Her husband was a parole officer for the California Youth Authority. She said she still trusts law enforcement. Her brother-in-law was killed by a robber during a holdup at the liquor store he owned.
juror (Seat 8): A man in his 40s believed to be of Middle Eastern descent.
Juror 326 (Seat 9): A white man
Juror 400 (Seat 10): A white female
Juror 88 (Seat 11): A white woman
Juror 227 (Seat 12): A white man
ALTERNATE JURORS: [/b]
Seat 1, Badge 369: Asian male
Seat 2, Badge 206: White male
Seat 3, Badge 205: White woman
Seat 4, Badge 330: Hispanic man .
Seat 5, Badge 27: White male.
Seat 6, Badge 294: White woman
Seat 7, Badge 367: White male
Seat 8, Badge 295: Black woman[/b]
cheers
for wrongfull death wasn't it?
someone thought he was
The vast majority of people--including people who celebrated his aquittal--think he did that shit. The general consensus is that the LAPD framed a guilty man and that guilty though he may be, the PD's actions meant he had to be acquitted.
After cops found Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, they took a blood sample from OJ. The amount was X. When it arrived at the lab, it was Y (I don't remember the exact amounts, but I wanna say it went from 7pointsomething to 5pointsomething). The difference between amounts was enough so that officers could have "strengthened" the case by dabbling a little here and there. It wasn't about Fuhrman, bloody gloves, or chipping golf balls that got the Juice loose. It was about the cops tampering with/strengthening the evidence making this case have reasonable doubt, as little of it as there may have been. I celebrated his acquittal because justice was served, reasonable doubt existed. If he was found guilty, then I would be concerned about the court system, criminal trials and jury process. You can't run a criminal justice system by "probably guilty."
This is my 2c, and I encourage debate or flaming all you want.
Peace
T.N.
He may or may not have done what he did, but his golf etiquette is shitty.
He was in his limo on the way to LAX at the time of the murders. Nicoles parents even said so in their original statement to the cops. The cops made them change it.
...except that the anti-aliasing is even worse on this one...
...cause I just pasted his face over the OJ one...
and making fun of some guy with a hideously deformed face due to a birth defect is cool?
the real killer is on the loose to this day, ojs innocence during that trial was as bright as the sun...not for 1 second did he seem like he had a reason or anything to do with the murders.
oj is truly sad that since nicoles murder...he could no longer beat her ass.
agreed. people be trippin. quit trippin. shit ain't worth it.
for real?
Try again - Manson didn't kill anyone. His "Family" did.
you fools all know OJ probably did that shit. I'm just being real.
no, because it would be a corny shirt.
Threats of murder.
Fleeing from police and saying he's going to kill himself. (Would an innocent person do that?)