Science problem (Black vs White) NRR
skel
You can't cheat karma 5,033 Posts
A new conundrum from my 13yo boy this weekend:A black object is black because it does not reflect any coloured light.Since all coloured light added together equals white, then a black object has absorbed the white light....and so black objects are white.
White objects, on the other hand, reflect all the coloured light and so are actually colourless rather than white.Or maybe they are black on the basis that black is the absence of colour.Black is the color of objects that do not emit or reflect light in any part of the visible spectrum; they absorb all such frequencies of light.
Black is white and white is black.......WTF?Not sure if this is a question of physics, chemistry, philosophy or language.....but somebody please help me out.BONUS BEATBlack is both a color and scientifically speaking the absence of color.
On January 16, 2008, researchers from Troy, New York???s Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute announced the creation of the darkest material on the planet. The material, which reflects only .045 percent of light, was created from carbon nanotubes stood on end. It absorbs nearly 30 times more light than the current standard for blackness, and is 3 times darker than the current record holder for darkest substance. Scientists claim that the new material has great potential in the manufacturing of solar panels.
Comments
White light can be broken down to its elemental colour components (which doesnt include black-so there for black isnt really a colour?), but you can't do the same with black, you can't breakdown or extract the colours in it.
By the way is there such a thing as black light? Does the colour black have any particles or frequency?
damn, good question for me to ponder tonight.... its up there with "what are we before we are born?" and "what would exist if there was nothingness"?
Intresting enough I was just reading an article about different 'creation myths' from around the globe annd how many all have the same story basis, that there was 'nothing' but darkness, usually dark still water, and in that void/nothingness/darkness existed the potential for everything,
nail on the head
This could bring down civilisation as we know it.
they dont absorb and contain; the 'absorption' of (white) light destroys the light waves. a black object isnt coloured black, it is just an object which absorbs b/w destroys light waves.
Ok, so the light wave gets destroyed.... except 'destroyed' means 'transferred into another form of energy', such as heat, right?
So 'black' objects exposed to light get hotter.
However... I hear that light has a wave / particle duality.
So can it be said, in some sense, that white light does indeed get absorbed, if you buy this idea that light is a particle?
The wave/particle duality of light means that light acts like both a wave and a particle at different times. When it acts as a particle, however, it is still a manifestation of subatomic energy, and as such, its absorption by the black surface can be thought of as either the transmutation of particulate or waveform light into heat.
Also, the egg came first, the sky is blue because of the way we perceive light refracted by the earth's atmosphere, and if a tree falls in the woods, percussion waves are created, but sound is a perception, so if no one is there to hear it, it does not create a sound.
You're welcome.
a black object does get hotter
see the picture above of the radiometer. paddles, one side white / one side black in a vacuum. when placed in direct sunlight it will start rotating as the light particles reflect off the white side and the black absorbs light creating reduced 'light resistance(???)' enables it to spin a la solar sail (kind of)
Jeez how about a spoiler alert next time?
PLEASE TO ANSWER:
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF LIFE? THANKS BILL NYE SCIENCE GUY
Difficult to say...
It's not a black and white issue
Whatever you make it to be.
You don't know the answer, do you.
i'm deep like that.
He explained to me a couple of months ago that he was trying to figure out how to make a perpetual motion machine, something which, he was eager to point out, has been attempted by great engineering minds the world over. He said his idea involved only a fan and an electric generator. With my limited scientific knowledge I tried to explain that in his situation there would still be a net energy loss. His response was along the lines of, "Oh, I thought you could just push the fan blade to start it and it would keep going forever."
He has these grand ideas, but lacks the level of schooling to actually do anything with all his brainpower, and I think it frustrates him.
Nothingness. To say that nothingness exists is a semantic error, not a contradiction of concepts."
I disagree. there can be no such thing as 'nothing' as there always has to be 'something' for that 'nothing' to exist inside of.. eg there is nothing inside the box, there is nothing hapeing at the club, there is nothing worth buying from that record store, there is nothing iside the fuel tank etc etc.
So even in the old creations myths that talk about 'nothingness' they refer to a infinite dark expansion of water that contains the roots of everything.
There is also a whole school of eastern philospohy a friend of mine was really into that ponders thought vs non thought. eg where do your thoughts come from, what are they before they exist as thoughts, do they have a 'body' to them, is the absence of thought equal to nothingness or is that something in itself.... etc
PS Skel...keep encouraging your kid to podner these questions, its cats like that who will be inventing new shit in the future. Leaders never follow.
"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves that you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. Q.E.D.."
"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
"Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.