paging HarveyCanal...
rootlesscosmo
12,848 Posts
YOU SEE THIS PIC ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE NEW YORK TIMES?!!? 
I mean, I always sorta believed you when you said chem trails were a shadowy gov't plot, but I did not appreciate just how deep it was until now.OBAMA/CHEMTRAIL TICKET '08. IT AINT SAFE NO MORE.
I mean, I always sorta believed you when you said chem trails were a shadowy gov't plot, but I did not appreciate just how deep it was until now.OBAMA/CHEMTRAIL TICKET '08. IT AINT SAFE NO MORE.
Comments
It's like it's spewing from his mic and brain
MICS BLAZING.
Rapp hands?
did the one Barry Osama happen to be on a campaign stop in TX??
think about it.
someone please dig up the chemtrails thread and school the boy. it's serious. so serious.
What should people believe?
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/GLOBE/contrails/pers/list.cgi
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/resources/Contrail_Formation_English.pdf
Love the soundtrack!
"Jus....throw ya hands in the air...if you like to breathe clean air..."
Yes, the soundtrack and arrows added to the "chemical proof". I've yet to see anyone provide any real chemical proof or evidence to support it. What to those guys at NASA know about water vapor and atmospheric conditions anyway? They must be part of the government conspiracy to cover the chemtrails up.
the government can secretly invent amazingly sophisticated chemicals that control the minds of millions of hapless civilians.........
but they cant figure out how not to make really huge and obvious and white?
this is the exact way they want you to think!
Flouride is OBVIOUSLY in tap water.
I agree with Harvey on this one. Flouride is definitely in your tap water, and there is a significant body of evidence that it is detrimental to your health when ingested. I won't vouch for the entirety of this website as I haven't read it all, nor can I say definitively that the science presented is completely sound, but this sums up the case against fluoride rather well.
Of course, I don't think that has anything to do with contrails, but dude has a point about fluoride.
Like all conspiracy theories this one ignores the clear danger and focuses on a phantom. There is plenty of evidence that jets are major polluters who poison the air and change weather.
Besides obviously burning huge quantities of fossil fuels they also routinely dump unburned fuel which is highly toxic and disipates into the atmosphere. The "harmless" water vapor makes our skies significantly less clear. After 9/11 when commercial flight was halted for a few days this was very clear and gave atmospheric scientist their first chance to study the difference. And on and on. But instead of being concerned about any of those real problems CT nuts chase after things that are not there. Then if I were to go to a local meeting on airport safety (and I live very close to our airport) and raise the issue of fuel dumping, people will laugh at me and say chemtrails are not real. Thank you Harvey.
And if I tell you that the CIA is outright murdering people in Haiti, you will tell me some shit about environmental pollution in Haiti instead...as that's 1. an easier evil for you to accept and feel like you can do something about and 2. just where your own personal focus happens to reside.
But yeah, calling people "nuts" is such the way to bring everyone together on a given issue.
That's fucked up that it's still in your tap water. It was outlawed in the 70's here in the Netherlands.
he does? and what is that point exactly? this thread is about the insane conspiracy theory that posits that airplanes flying above us are acutally unmarked gov't chemical emitters designed to kill us.
on the other hand the gov't makes no secret about flouride in our water. it's acknowledged that flouride is added to tap water by many municipalities to reduce tooth decay. no one denies this. you think it's harmful? okay, well I think it's harmful that we allow cows to be pumped with hormones and then the gov't subsidizes the mechanized milking of these cows so that we can drink the milk.
the gov't legalizes/subsidizes/promotes lots of shit that many people believe is harmful to our health.
in contrast the idea that US ogv't-designed aircrafts are criss-crossing the sky spraying deadly poison on us is lunacy.
The point I was referring to is that flouride is bad for you, and it is being put into the water supply. As used by Harvey in this instance, it was a rhetorical red herring, but on its own merits, it's a valid point, I think.
And of course the chemtrail thing is lunacy. I was one of the first and most outspoken critics of Harvey's chemtrail theory. I believe he even intimated that my heart may be partially???if not wholly???composed of Milk Duds. Or perhaps it is one giant Milk Dud (not sure about that part, as he refused to elaborate). Or was it a giant Milk Dud that somehow pumped Kool Aid? Who knows. The snack food metaphors are beyond me.
Why not put soap in tap water to reduce B.O.
Flouride works to strengthen teeth when it is applied to the surface of the teeth. When ingested and metabolized, it has a host of other effects, most of which are detrimental. I encourage you to check out the link I posted. Food for thought.
Let's at least do a study