That second Artifacts album
faux_rillz
14,343 Posts
Why do I own a copy of this?I just listened to it for the first time in probably close to a decade and these guys are seriously not what's up.The production and the fact that it was 1994 really camouflaged their shortcomings on the first album.b/wShawn J. Period = why, exactly, did dudes think he was so great for a minute? His schitts on the Artifacts record are just boring.
Comments
I think I might be willing to put a small amount of money down that one of you poptarts comes on here tawmbout "but his drum sounds, yo!"
Me too.
This was before the days of downloading a preview--shame on me for gripping it for ten years, though.
I see your ARtifacts and raise you with a Cella Dwellas
sayin, I'm just glad that all that crap in my collection was from my college radio free promo days
Loud was ridiculous with all the slightly different promos they gave out to every tom dick and harry
I'm sayin', they wasnt the greatest rappers, even tho' i could argue with you about UG from Cella Dwellas being a damn good rapper. The second Artifacts LP sucks azz for sure and the 1st one is a classic (thanks to T-RAY). Im feeling what you're saying, but i'm kind of missing that era so much that i feel bad bashing groups like Artifacts. And "The Ultimate" (the Showbiz version) wasn't that bad...Or was it??lol...
This group is great.
Not so much for their music but for making explicit the connection between backpackerism and Dungeons and Dragons.
Naw, it was really quite good. But yeah, otherwise...
LOL
Yeah, I did buy that 12" when it came out, on some "Beatnuts + The Artifacts = Yes, plaese!" but was immediately disappointed.
Do I or do I not recall you speaking up in defense of this record within the past five years, though?
And wasn't there a spate of El da Sensei vs. Tame One dis 12"s during the Sandbox era?
That schitt is comedy--it's like me thinking the listening public has an interest in my beef with the dude from the mailroom.
Why did you remind me i bought that, eyes closed. And i clearly remember how thin the vinyl was so it was very easy for me to do a frisbee with. Or maybe i threw it above steam to re-do some Dali's clock...
Bet the dude who coined the phrase Rawkus Deadstock Gold! has...
Yeah, but this Faux's thread. He hates his indie backpacker past with a vengeance.
The Hatt must stop.
http://www.zshare.net/audio/6449121b0fb2f0/
Man, I like some of those EDS singles...was pruning recently and decided to keep most of them. El Da Sensei is on point.
Their 1st album is a classic,NO weak shit on it..The producetion is sick on there..I would put that album in my top 15 for the 90's,easily.
Their 2nd album "That's Them" is not as good as the first but a dope album,and easily one of the best album's of 1997.
"Art Of Facts"
"The Ultimate"
"The Ultimate" Showbiz remix
"Coolaboration Of Mc's" Lord Finesse and Lord Jamar
"This Is The Way"
"The Interview"
"Return To The Wrongside"
ALL dope tracks imo
I've never met a person that said their 1st album isn't a classic or at least didn't like some of their 2nd album also.
Only on here i guess
I believe it was "Collaboration of Mics."
In any case, it takes the prize for Weakest Song Title (1997).
faux_rillz = why, exactly, did dudes think he was so great for a minute? His schitts on the Soulstrut are just boring.
Who are "these same dudes" exactly?
I never fucked with the Artifacts 2nd record, didn't back in 1997 and see no reason to now.
As I wrote in the third poast of the thread, I fuck with their 1st LP to this day.
I like Hell Hath No Fury.
Deal with it.
did dudes think so? i think the first mos def 12" holds up. didnt he go super christian? i heard he stopped sampling because it was still stealing in the eyes of god
Oh, believe you me, I got all the skeletons of this era in my closet. Or, technically, garage, which is where all my deadstock Rawkus gold and OG Guesswhyld 12"s reside.
As for the idea that "That's Them" was one of the best albums of 1997.