›

F.A.T. "Funky and Tough" O.G. Czech?

mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
edited January 2006 in Strut Central
I found a copy that isn't the current reissue (which has clear, reissue info on the back) but I heard there was an earlier reissue that looks like the O.G. The copy I have is a tough one to call: the cover says O.G., the record looks more like a reish BUT the matrix #s point back to O.G. Anyone got matrix #s for me to double check with?Thanks.

  Comments

  • tripledoubletripledouble 7,636 Posts
    dont got the matrix, but the old reissue was very very similar looking to the og
  • Birdman9Birdman9 5,417 Posts
    dont got the matrix, but the old reissue was very very similar looking to the og

    SMELL TEST
  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    dont got the matrix, but the old reissue was very very similar looking to the og

    Ah, ok. This is prob the one I have then. It has a matrix number of TK305 which is why I thought it might be the real deal since this was distributed by TK originally. But it just seems a bit too reish.
  • funkyoldboyfunkyoldboy 97 Posts
    Matrix of original says B-305-A , B-305-B, peace G
  • faux_rillzfaux_rillz 14,343 Posts
    I found a copy that isn't the current reissue (which has clear, reissue info on the back) but I heard there was an earlier reissue that looks like the O.G. The copy I have is a tough one to call: the cover says O.G., the record looks more like a reish BUT the matrix #s point back to O.G.

    Anyone got matrix #s for me to double check with?

    Thanks.

    Take this schitt over to the TFT thread, son.
  • youngEINSTEINyoungEINSTEIN 2,443 Posts
    yo. funky and tough reish is the most accurate reish i've ever seen! stumped me with this one a few times in japan. proceed with caution. peace, stein. . .
  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    I found a copy that isn't the current reissue (which has clear, reissue info on the back) but I heard there was an earlier reissue that looks like the O.G. The copy I have is a tough one to call: the cover says O.G., the record looks more like a reish BUT the matrix #s point back to O.G.

    Anyone got matrix #s for me to double check with?

    Thanks.

    Take this schitt over to the TFT thread, son.

    Quit hatting with your .

  • Jonny_PaycheckJonny_Paycheck 17,825 Posts
    hell no that record is terrible.
  • MondeyanoMondeyano Reykjavik 863 Posts
    hell no that record is terrible.
    Good. I passed on that shit a few months back for no money just because I thought it would be..
  • SwayzeSwayze 14,705 Posts
    hell no that record is terrible.
    Good. I passed on that shit a few months back for no money just because I thought it would be..

    The record sucks, but selling it for $125+ is always nice.
  • Jonny_PaycheckJonny_Paycheck 17,825 Posts
    hell no that record is terrible.
    Good. I passed on that shit a few months back for no money just because I thought it would be..

    The record sucks, but selling it for $125+ is always nice.

    Ha! Just about to write the same thing
  • tripledoubletripledouble 7,636 Posts
    i kinda liked it....
  • Jonny_PaycheckJonny_Paycheck 17,825 Posts
    i kinda liked it....

    Shut up, dicksnot!
  • MondeyanoMondeyano Reykjavik 863 Posts
    hell no that record is terrible.
    Good. I passed on that shit a few months back for no money just because I thought it would be..

    The record sucks, but selling it for $125+ is always nice.
    Then again it was in Japan and may have been a reisssue. If no then breakface. I do have worse things than that in my repertoire.. like not buying all three copies of an in-shrink near-minty ridiculously rare icelandic folk record that goes for $$$.
  • HollafameHollafame 844 Posts
    BUMP

    My matrix # is 5032 TK305-1A S40774

    OG Kush or fakin' the funk?
  • bobtheorangebobtheorange 432 Posts
    The runout groove should be B-305-A / B-305-B. The OG label looks like this:
  • bobtheorangebobtheorange 432 Posts
    .
  • bobtheorangebobtheorange 432 Posts
    .
  • bobtheorangebobtheorange 432 Posts
    .
  • HollafameHollafame 844 Posts
    Hey, thanks BtheO.

    Looks like I have the infamous re-junk.

    As mentioned above, this re appears legit in every other way. WMIC.
Sign In or Register to comment.