von Trier - Nymphomaniac (movie-r)
bassie
11,710 Posts
Anyone else see it? Thoughts?
I have this Lars von Trier problem where I keep trying to recapture the magic I felt watching Europa. I've come close, but it's never been the same again.
I put off seeing this most recent attempt for as long as I could and just bit the bullet and went. I was expecting abject disappointment but was pleasantly surprised. A lot of good ideas with touch and go execution.
I am not sure about seeing Volume 2...I am ok with leaving all those questions unanswered but I would like to see more of present-day, adult Joe (aka Charlotte Gainsbourg) after that rail that played her in Volume 1. Just not sure if it will be worth seeing the story just to see more of Gainsbourg.
Biggest peeve, that her character didn't know who Edgar Allan Poe was.
I have this Lars von Trier problem where I keep trying to recapture the magic I felt watching Europa. I've come close, but it's never been the same again.
I put off seeing this most recent attempt for as long as I could and just bit the bullet and went. I was expecting abject disappointment but was pleasantly surprised. A lot of good ideas with touch and go execution.
I am not sure about seeing Volume 2...I am ok with leaving all those questions unanswered but I would like to see more of present-day, adult Joe (aka Charlotte Gainsbourg) after that rail that played her in Volume 1. Just not sure if it will be worth seeing the story just to see more of Gainsbourg.
Biggest peeve, that her character didn't know who Edgar Allan Poe was.
Comments
I've read good things and it seems to deal with the honest uncomfortable side of sex which I would rather see then just sex for sex sake. I've also heard it was quite funny. Are those 2 statements true?
I laughed out loud a few times and practically jumped out of my skin once lol
POSSIBLE SPOILERS
Hmmm, it's hard to comment on the sex-for-sex's sake because that's somewhat the point of the whole film. If one watches porn, it won't be shocking - except to see it on a giant screen I guess, given most people are online for their smut. For all the fucking going on, it is very well done and natural and humorous and nicely woven into the rest of the movie/story. I am not saying anything new here to say it is a character study. The interaction between her and Seligman is quite good, especially as his role begins to emerge.
I don't think I am necessarily the yardstick to use, but I didn't feel uncomfortable at any point.
"Youre a fisherman, reading the river!"
:sick:
My companion and I read all that fly fishing, cake fork and cantus firmus business differently: he thought it was von Trier over-explaining and beating us over the head with the analogies and "look at how much I know about random shit" and I thought it was more of a character device than a story one. It was for her benefit more than the audience's, if that makes sense. Seligman responds to her stories by acting sympathetic, shy and wide-eyed by changing the subject and/or normalizing them as a way to disarm her. You can't tell to what extent she's making shit up, nor to what extent he is playing a role.
The music sucked.
My post didn't go through last night but the gist of it was......I think we are talking about the same thing your wordings just better.
Exactly what I thought.
First part is well done and interesting to watch. I was disappointed by the second part though - not sure why exactly, but it was partly painful to watch and leads nowhere I would say.
I guess he means that special kind of Lars von Trier fun.
Well, at least I'm making an informed decision going in lol. At this point I might watch Volume 2 if for no other reason than a completist one.
As far as Nymphomaniac, I'm waiting for the five and a half hour long director's cut.
Hey I thought it was me with the dismissive blanket statements...
Really that bad?
Anitchrist is all style-no-substance which makes the throwback feminine/nature ideology and predictable misogyny even harder to take than usual. I can count the number of movies that I actually felt like I wasted my time with on one hand, Antichrist is one of them. It's wanky and boring.
Watched it in a double bill a couple of months ago but left 1/2 an hour before the end of part 2 because we were bored and the cinema stunk, no air con, B.O. city, yuk.
I watched the end of part 2 yesterday and thought: pffffff.
Can't really understand the motivation to make it so long, and it was so made-up/ daft.
And worst of all now I dislike Charlotte G. Damn you, Lars!
(I'd have to see it this week before the run finishes on Thursday)
I don't think you're missing much, though now I think about it (and, OK, look the synopsis up to remind myself) the first chapter is interesting if only because Jamie Bell is usually such a wimp. The next bit is stupid, a bit of lesbo action then the pathetic denouement.
Maybe you should see it through to make your own mind up. Someone I know said the end was a twist. I don't think it's that. But everyone's different and tastes vary. (Off The Wall)
I am guessing the end has something to do with Seligman. What I don't know. Short of it all being a dream, him being her father who never died or the whole thing being an elaborate role-playing scene that the two of them pre-planned ("I am left for dead in an alley, you find me and take me home..."), it will undoubtedly be typical von Trier. Either way, Seligman's character and their relationship is foreshadowing it up the wazoo.
[strike]www.pr*nhub.com[/strike]
EDIT "pronhub" actually takes you to the real site! Google autocorrecting?
u predicted that ending?
I loved it but also hated the ending. Seemed tacked-on, ill thought-through, somehow annoying... but then, I guess that's what he was going for.
Not that I predicted it, but predictable in the sense that it seemed like an easy cop out ending. It'd be a fair assumption that dude would end up doing something bad. I don't know,. It just didn't seem too original.
Either u predicted the ending or you assumed dude would do something bad?
Which is it?
Were you completely shocked by it? Maybe predictable was the wrong word. I just meant what Kinetic said, like it felt tacked on, something typical of lazy movie endings. Maybe I'm wrong. I feel like the movie itself was unique, but the ending left me thinking "meh."