Does anybody still support Obama? (NRR)

crazypoprockcrazypoprock 1,037 Posts
edited December 2010 in Strut Central
Just curious...I mean obviously the right can't stand him but he's really let down progressives and his democratic base. If he compromises on the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy it will be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Obama has certainly been dealt a tough hand but he just caves on everything! Thoughts?
«1345

  Comments


  • Obama will always have his blind, loyal base just as Bush did.

    Of course Obama is a nightmare for fiscal conservatives, but I would have to think that the ideological liberals out there were greatly dissapointed with the healthcare reform.

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts
    I still support the president.

  • That's cool...I really want to give him my support but he's making it really hard!

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    What would lack of support mean? On a local level, I'd be more willing to back viable 3rd party candidates running for the house or even senate but I'm not about to vote against Obama in 2012.

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts
    mannybolone said:
    I'm not about to vote against Obama in 2012.

    This is what I am talking about.

    We (the left) can easily defeat Obama by running a candidate in the primary against him or a 3rd party candidate in the general.

    I never supported the health care plan that passed, but...
    It is the best health care plan we have and a huge accomplishment.
    Nixon, Carter and Clinton all tried to get health care passed and couldn't.
    It is easy to hate on the health care bill, but the fact that soon almost all Americans will finally have access to health care is a huge accomplishment.
    There is a whole long list of his accomplishments, that are never talked about, or not liberal enough for many, but very important.

  • phongonephongone 1,652 Posts
    You guys can call President Obama "weak" and "soft," I'll call him "pragmatic."

    He caved on the Bush-era tax cut to get tax cuts to the middle class AND extension of unemployment benefits AND 2% reduction in payroll taxes (which should be added stimulus). Also this deal with help procure support for the ratification of the START treaty, which is crucial from the defense perspective. The "line in the sand" bullshit would have gotten nothing.

    BTW, hate to break it to you but there's no one out there that could seriously challenge Obama in the primaries.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    phongone said:

    BTW, hate to break it to you but there's no one out there that could seriously challenge Obama in the primaries.

    Agreed. But a left-leaning third party candidate with enough clout could certainly swing things in key states. Again, I'm not down for that.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    phongone said:
    this deal with help procure support for the ratification of the START treaty

    You sure about that? What suggests this will be true, especially after the lame duck session gets replaced by the GOP majority in the house?

    Caving on tax cuts for the rich is not a great compromise to achieve unemployment extensions.

    And so much for both party's supposed devotion to deficit management!

    Wonder how the Tea Party will spin this.

  • There's also talk of Bloomberg running which would make things interesting!

    Sure Obama is stuck between a rock and a hard place but he has the bully pulpit and public opinion on his side...he really should stop offering olive branches to the republicans and start showing some spine...I mean do we really want to support him just because there's no other alternative? That's pretty weak.

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts
    phongone said:
    You guys can call President Obama "weak" and "soft," I'll call him "pragmatic."

    He caved on the Bush-era tax cut to get tax cuts to the middle class AND extension of unemployment benefits AND 2% reduction in payroll taxes (which should be added stimulus). Also this deal with help procure support for the ratification of the START treaty, which is crucial from the defense perspective. The "line in the sand" bullshit would have gotten nothing.

    BTW, hate to break it to you but there's no one out there that could seriously challenge Obama in the primaries.

    Not sure what you mean by serious.
    Anyone who runs against him and damages his standing with his base will greatly increase the chances that he loses in November.
    It's 2 years away. Who could do it? John Kerry? Chelsea Clinton? Russ Feingold, Ron Wyden?

    If someone chooses to challenge Obama what they need to do is build a ground game in Iowa and one other early state. A 40% polling in Iowa would produce huge headlines and allow the candidate to continue.
    It is not about beating Obama, it is about eroding away support from the people he needs most if he is to win a second term.
    It's what RKennedy did to Johnson in 1968 and TKennedy did to Carter in 1980.

    Politics.

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts
    crazypoprock said:
    There's also talk of Bloomberg running which would make things interesting!

    Sure Obama is stuck between a rock and a hard place but he has the bully pulpit and public opinion on his side...he really should stop offering olive branches to the republicans and start showing some spine...I mean do we really want to support him just because there's no other alternative? That's pretty weak.

    Most people didn't vote for Obama. They voted for who they thought Obama was.

    If you look at what has always done in his life and what he has always said, he is not interested in "showing some spine".

    He is interested in getting stuff done. Even if it looks like the Health Care bill and not the single payer that everyone knows is better. The goal is to get it done. He is not offering olive branches, he is getting things done. Or at least trying.

  • Options
    phongone said:
    You guys can call President Obama "weak" and "soft," I'll call him "pragmatic."

    He caved on the Bush-era tax cut to get tax cuts to the middle class AND extension of unemployment benefits AND 2% reduction in payroll taxes (which should be added stimulus). Also this deal with help procure support for the ratification of the START treaty, which is crucial from the defense perspective. The "line in the sand" bullshit would have gotten nothing.

    BTW, hate to break it to you but there's no one out there that could seriously challenge Obama in the primaries.

    This seems about right.

    People can be "disappointed" in Obama all they want, but I'm not sure what they were expecting. He doesn't have magical powers. Imagine that.

    There isn't a single Republican out there who is even worth considering as an alternative as far as I'm concerned. That party has gone batshit crazy and will remain that way for a long time. I think it's at least 50/50 that Palin will be their nominee in 2012, and a party that could nominate a delusional, ignorant sociopath like her just has no business running things.

  • phongonephongone 1,652 Posts
    crazypoprock said:
    There's also talk of Bloomberg running which would make things interesting!

    Sure Obama is stuck between a rock and a hard place but he has the bully pulpit and public opinion on his side...he really should stop offering olive branches to the republicans and start showing some spine...I mean do we really want to support him just because there's no other alternative? That's pretty weak.

    You know Bloomberg is a Republican right? Are you talking about a general election challenge?

    So please school us on how he's going to pass his legislative agenda by being a tough, bad ass with a Republican-led house and a slim Democratic majority in the Senate.

  • DJ_EnkiDJ_Enki 6,475 Posts
    mannybolone said:
    Wonder how the Tea Party will spin this.
    "The Kenyan Usurper hates 'Murrica!"


  • phongone said:
    crazypoprock said:
    There's also talk of Bloomberg running which would make things interesting!

    Sure Obama is stuck between a rock and a hard place but he has the bully pulpit and public opinion on his side...he really should stop offering olive branches to the republicans and start showing some spine...I mean do we really want to support him just because there's no other alternative? That's pretty weak.

    You know Bloomberg is a Republican right? Are you talking about a general election challenge?

    So please school us on how he's going to pass his legislative agenda by being a tough, bad ass with a Republican-led house and a slim Democratic majority in the Senate.

    You are aware that he's been the mayor of the overwhelmingly Democratic New York City for close to a decade now right? He isn't your typical republican...and he would run as an independent. He has the spine and management skills that Obama lacks. I'm not saying I'd vote for him...I just think he could win.

  • Options
    Jonny_Paycheck said:

    Intercourse the penguin!

  • Obama is the best president we've had over the last 30 years. If you are a democrat and disagree, than please familiarize yourself with the fact that Obama does not control the universe. He can't immediately reverse the global economic downturn, the disparity between rich and poor, or the threat of terrorism. His beliefs are on the right (as in good) side of every democratic issue; if you are frustrated that he can't get legislation passed (as a moderate), how could you possibly say he is not "progressive" enough?

    Also, just because the country was in better shape during prior presidencies doesn't say much about anything. If you let Carrot Top coach the 1992 Dream Team, they probably still would have won a gold.

    How can you not be proud of Obama and what he stands for if you supported him in '08? What has changed?

    I ride and will be volunteering/donating in '12.

  • phongonephongone 1,652 Posts
    Jonny_Paycheck said:

    This photo is burning a hole in my soul. i cant look at it beyond 5 seconds.

  • P**r*ck, you do know Bloomberg really sucks, right?

  • Options
    phongone said:
    Jonny_Paycheck said:

    This photo is burning a hole in my soul. i cant look at it beyond 5 seconds.

    Yeah, I really wish I'd never seen it. That harpy looks like she subsists on a diet of orphan faces.

  • keithvanhorn said:
    Obama is the best president we've had over the last 30 years. If you are a democrat and disagree, than please familiarize yourself with the fact that Obama does not control the universe. He can't immediately reverse the global economic downturn, the disparity between rich and poor, or the threat of terrorism. His beliefs are on the right (as in good) side of every democratic issue; if you are frustrated that he can't get legislation passed (as a moderate), how could you possibly say he is not "progressive" enough?

    Also, just because the country was in better shape during prior presidencies doesn't say much about anything. If you let Carrot Top coach the 1992 Dream Team, they probably still would have won a gold.

    How can you not be proud of Obama and what he stands for if you supported him in '08? What has changed?

    I ride and will be volunteering/donating in '12.


  • Jonny_Paycheck said:
    P**r*ck, you do know Bloomberg really sucks, right?

    I know this J*h*ny...just playing devil's advocate! And for some reason I like him even though he goes against many of my core beliefs.

  • white_teawhite_tea 3,262 Posts
    keithvanhorn said:
    Obama is the best president we've had over the last 30 years. If you are a democrat and disagree, than please familiarize yourself with the fact that Obama does not control the universe. He can't immediately reverse the global economic downturn, the disparity between rich and poor, or the threat of terrorism. His beliefs are on the right (as in good) side of every democratic issue; if you are frustrated that he can't get legislation passed (as a moderate), how could you possibly say he is not "progressive" enough?

    Also, just because the country was in better shape during prior presidencies doesn't say much about anything. If you let Carrot Top coach the 1992 Dream Team, they probably still would have won a gold.

    How can you not be proud of Obama and what he stands for if you supported him in '08? What has changed?

    I ride and will be volunteering/donating in '12.

    I would have liked something substantial on climate change. I also disagree with extending tax cuts to those folks pulling in a quarter-mil annually, but can also be OK with offering that as a compromise. Extending unemployment benefits for 13 months, while somewhat of a stimulus for the economy, also seems to be delaying the inevitable for some folks. Quibbles? Not really, but I still ride for Obama--pretty much everything he does has a solid logic behind it, even if we can disagree on the decisions. Can't be mad at that.

    Can you imagine if we had privatized Social Security, something that never seemed even remotely like a good idea from jump and seems even more idiotic in retrospect.

  • RockadelicRockadelic Out Digging 13,993 Posts
    I support our President.

    Two years is a long time and a lot can happen.

  • LaserWolfLaserWolf Portland Oregon 11,517 Posts
    Who ever the Rs pick in 2012 they will be on the Fox payroll, unless it is Mit Romney.

  • white_teawhite_tea 3,262 Posts
    I would also add that, aside from politicking during the mid-terms, Obama's presidency does not at all seem like an extended campaign for re-election, that he is truly serving in the best interests of the entire country.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts
    Bloomberg could be an interesting 3rd party guy ala a vaguely more lefty Perot but he'd never win a primary for either party, let alone the Presidency.

  • deejdeej 5,125 Posts
    obama has passed more liberal legislation than any president has managed since the Great Society. keep things in perspective dorks

Sign In or Register to comment.