How do you not get an album leaked before release?
unlascivious
220 Posts
seriously - every single album that comes out seems to drop on the innanet before it's in shops or even before it's pressed up. i don't see how there are so many middlemen in the chain between the artist and the retail outlets that regardless of album demand both majors and indies are victims. don't get me wrong, i love the fact that i can easily access the music and i'll be the first one to download the music, but if this was you or someone you knew how could it even be remotely avoided or even delayed? would this even be a smart thing to do nowadays given the hypemachine possible benefits?
Comments
completly wrong
That's not a bad idea except:
1) Don't expect your album to get reviewed by anyone.
2) All it takes is one person to actually care enough to digitize it and post it and then it's .
I still think an annoying promo-bot goes a long way to discouraging bootlegging.
how far in advance do you usually receive promos?
a simple solution i thought of for tracking down leaks with promos would be to mark each copy with a sound unique to its own copy so if/when the promo leaks, you can at least tell who leaked it and take whatever action from there
Some of the big labels now are tagging individual promo cd's, so if they get uploaded to the net they can trace where it was sent too. My Kano cd was marked like this...Big Brother Is Watching You...Think Pure Thoughts...
Definition?
I don't know how far in advance retail stores need stuff but even a week is long enough for a leak to cause damage.
As for advance promos, if you're talking about a magazine review, it's normally THREE MONTHS.
That's a big reason why, besides watermarking advances, a lot of big labels won't even release an advance. Instead, they host a listening session where the writer is expected to review the album based on a one-time-through session, usually there with other writers. Personally, I think it's wack as fuck and too many magazines are complying. They should just say, "either we get the advance, or you don't get the review" but of course, these days, I feel like mags need the artists more than the other way around.
Graf,
You can hear the promo-bot on the Dilla download. IT's basically a recording that punches in every song or two that goes, "THIS IS FOR PROMOTIONAL USE ONLY!!!"
Some rap artists have gotten pretty creative with this...De La Soul, with "Buhloone Mind State" were one of the first who practically made a game out of their promo-bot, using donkey brays and that "Guido" dude saying, "Freakin...lick 'em." Shit was so funny some reviewers though that's how the album was supposed to sound. It was De La, after all.
These days, Definitive Jux and Stonesthrow both heavily promo-bot their advances.
patent pending.
to be honest, i'd be kind of sad if that wasn't on the final release at least once.
It isn't impossible, this is the quote from the back of the track listing...
"This promotional cd is unique and traceable.Warner Music is able to monitor its use and identify the source of any unauthorised copies."
Ahhhh. Have they considered using Funkmaster Flex or DJ Clue? I find that their obnoxious random screaming tends to make songs unlistenable for more than 15 or 20 seconds.
I understand though. I'm more familiar with it on promo VHS and DVDs where they either run "Promo only" stuff across the bottom... or a more creative one was on the Rounders promo, where ever 10 minutes or so they would flip the scene to black and white only for about a minute.
That a good idea.
Except it would take about 30 seconds in CoolEdit to strip out all inaudible frequencies, and then you're back to square one.
I do it all the time to strip out low end rumble that would be below any instrument (although still audible in that case).
A different tactic would be to perhaps insert audio that is cancelled out between the two channels but still identifiable on the track.
Or even better, just drop in a millisecond of static but use the wave pattern to identify the CD.
ayo?
as odub said, if the magazines are dependent upon the artists then why would a release form be out of the question?
But I never wanted to get into that game.
Don't want things to get leaked? Do shit like prince. Though, once the stuff gets to the label. It's totally out in the open.
In any case, it's usually not a writer leaking an advance: it's more likely some middle-man in the studio who can cash in some chingo bling and not have shit traced back to him.
The White Stripes did this with "Elephant" or something and it was recorded from vinyl to mp3 in a matter of days I think.
hi guys
I know Def Jux and Stones Throw both do a good job of releasing a promo version chock full of annoying drops but hey it helps promote the album and yah.
It may sound ok. But it's still not a 100% direct digital copy. Like you would get from a CD.
They should just send out promo CD's direct to DJ's with the DJ's name right at the beginning of the track.
Here's something sad...
http://toronto.craigslist.org/emd/119423793.html
Pretty sure the Atlantic Little Brother advance/review copies were tagged as such as well w/ the recipient's name stamped on the face of the disc...
it would be an inaccurate representation of the content, but it would probably work too.
I don't know any credible writers who leak their promos early, and I think major label paranoia about this is ridiculous. Labels should focus less attention on building the perfect promo mousetrap and more on that shady intern in the studio hovering over those unmastered Ebony Eyez tracks. That said, in some cases I'm not sure major labels actually truly honestly care that much about albums getting leaked too far in advance.