›

It happens again

ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
edited June 2005 in Strut Central
http://suckarepellent.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=133&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0Another writer/blogger who needs my Paypal address.Maybe if I ever get a transfer I'll be able to afford changing my cheerleader title. Seriously though, Juneteenth parade and drumline competition in Austin this past weekend...whoa!!! Too bad I missed Frankie Beverly and Maze.

  Comments

  • ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
    And again:

    "I think Solar (not to be confused with the bay area powerhouse, Solar Music Group) deserves some respect, and not just for Klymaxx and Lakeside. But for putting on a handful of otherwise local rap groups. Between 4 Deep and DC's Section 8 Mob, they were giving "regional" rap some shine well before us carpetbagging hipsters made it so popular with the kids and even before the Japanese made it a financially sound investment. Of course, they failed to promote either of these acts very efficiently, so maybe not."

    Hello all.
  • CosmoCosmo 9,768 Posts
    Solar Records production values was blaze as fuck. I really don't know what else you're talking about though.
  • ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
    Solar Records production values was blaze as fuck. I really don't know what else you're talking about though.

    I'm talking about my words getting quoted left and right like I'm Chuck D, or Robbie Van Winkle, or somewhere in between.

    But to continue my good thoughts, the DFW all star marching band chopping and screwing their ish at Saturday's Juneteenth parade...

  • Terry_ClubbupTerry_Clubbup 833 Posts

    I'm talking about my words getting quoted left and right like I'm Chuck D, or Robbie Van Winkle, or somewhere in between.





  • ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
    Right back at ya:

  • coselmedcoselmed 1,114 Posts
    Are these your words verbatim, or do these people just happen to share your opinion?





    WHAT IS NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT?[/b]



    Several categories of material are generally not eligible for federal copyright protection. These include among others:



    Works that have not been fixed in a tangible form of expression (for example, choreographic works that have not been notated or recorded, or improvisational speeches or performances that have not been written or recorded)



    Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans; familiar symbols or designs; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring; mere listings of ingredients or contents



    Ideas, procedures, methods, systems, processes, concepts, principles, discoveries, or devices, as distinguished from a description, explanation, or illustration[/b]



    Works consisting entirely of information that is common property and containing no original authorship (for example: standard calendars, height and weight charts, tape measures and rulers, and lists or tables taken from public documents or other common sources)





    http://www.copyright.gov/



  • ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
    Are these your words verbatim, or do these people happen to share your opinion?

    http://www.copyright.gov/

    Lawyers are the pits, for the world is way too fuzzy for static definitions.

    But yeah, the first article took my statement verbatim.

    The second, my buddy Noz...he's almost excused, but we both know where his idea of "carpetbagger" came from.
  • grandpa_shiggrandpa_shig 5,799 Posts
    Are these your words verbatim, or do these people happen to share your opinion?

    http://www.copyright.gov/

    Lawyers are the pits, for the world is way too fuzzy for static definitions.

    But yeah, the first article took my statement verbatim.

    The second, my buddy Noz...he's almost excused, but we both know where his idea of "carpetbagger" came from.

    hey champ, the term "carpetbagger" predates you. just thought id point that out.
  • coselmedcoselmed 1,114 Posts
    Are these your words verbatim, or do these people happen to share your opinion?



    http://www.copyright.gov/



    Lawyers are the pits, for the world is way too fuzzy for static definitions.



    But yeah, the first article took my statement verbatim.



    The second, my buddy Noz...he's almost excused, but we both know where his idea of "carpetbagger" came from.



    I can't open the link to the first one, but why don't you send the guy an e-mail and ask him to properly credit his source?
  • ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
    Are these your words verbatim, or do these people happen to share your opinion?

    http://www.copyright.gov/

    Lawyers are the pits, for the world is way too fuzzy for static definitions.

    But yeah, the first article took my statement verbatim.

    The second, my buddy Noz...he's almost excused, but we both know where his idea of "carpetbagger" came from.

    hey champ, the term "carpetbagger" predates you. just thought id point that out.

    Noz...he's almost excused, but we both know where his idea of "carpetbagger" came from.
  • bull_oxbull_ox 5,056 Posts
    I think the fact that your words are being used to mock you makes it okay, dude.
  • ArchaicArchaic 633 Posts
    Are these your words verbatim, or do these people happen to share your opinion?

    http://www.copyright.gov/

    Lawyers are the pits, for the world is way too fuzzy for static definitions.

    But yeah, the first article took my statement verbatim.

    The second, my buddy Noz...he's almost excused, but we both know where his idea of "carpetbagger" came from.

    I can't open the link to the first one, but why don't you send the guy an e-mail and ask him to properly credit his source?

    It's not that serious. I'm actually glad to have my internet arguments turn into blog discussions. I just like to call fools out when they pretend that I'm half-baked yet spend so much of their own time, even apart from my interaction, reacting to my ideas.
  • noznoz 3,625 Posts
Sign In or Register to comment.