iPod + IDJ2 versus Vinyl + Technics 1210s

froovy · June 2006

Anybody converted their vinyl collection yet?

Brian · June 2006

i have absolutely no idea why anyone would use those over serato or even cdjs
thats not even including that shit is corny as a muufuckah

froovy · June 2006

i have absolutely no idea why anyone would use those over serato or even cdjs
thats not even including that shit is corny as a muufuckah

anybody comfortable djing off cds should have no problem djing off their ipod.
technology has moved forward.

vinyl still has my affection, but I will be happily trying this out when it is released

unlascivious · June 2006

i have absolutely no idea why anyone would want to buy technics and spend thousands on records when their collection can already be completely contained on a mini hard drive, even if that shit is corny as a muufuckah

DOR · June 2006

Get with the cheapness... I'm wondering if it can control my microwave tho

hogginthefogg · June 2006

For the millionth time:

They have no pitch control, so every "mix" will be a trainwreck.

Who wants to buy TWO ipods? (for that white one on the left)

Does that darker model pictured on the banner work off of one?

unlascivious · June 2006

For the millionth time:

They have no pitch control, so every "mix" will be a trainwreck.

Who wants to buy TWO ipods? (for that white one on the left)

Does that darker model pictured on the banner work off of one?

numark wouldn't make the same mistake twice...

Integrated iPod slot with adjustable mount
Seamless looping
Pitch control
Large backlit display with revolutionary user interface
Ability to scratch music
Real-time visuals include Track Profiles and Waveforms
Record to an iPod or other connected USB media
Facilitates mixing with three or more USB Hard Drives or Apple iPod???s with USB hub
Many USB ports to plug in iPods, memory keys and hard drives
Play music off two iPods simultaneously, play two songs off same iPod
Formats supported: mp3, ogg vorbis, FLAC
Pitch control with multiple ranges up to +/- 100%
Beatkeeper??? technology with TAP override function
Scratch and search ability via two large jog wheels
XML playlist support
USB Keyboard support

for the average kid who already has an ipod, a digital music library, and the desire to be a bar mitzvah superstar, this set-up isn't so bad.

Swayze · June 2006

For the millionth time:

They have no pitch control, so every "mix" will be a trainwreck.

Who wants to buy TWO ipods? (for that white one on the left)

Does that darker model pictured on the banner work off of one?

Unfortunately dun, the black one (IDJ2) has pitch control and will play two songs simultaneously from a single iPod.

I say unfortunately because these features are just enough to foll some idiots into buying inferior Numark quality shit. It all looks good on paper, but when it comes down to putting down a mix, I doubt anything produced from an iDj2 will be that

it's a fucking Numark. On paper[/b] EVERYTHING Numark makes is better than the top brands, but when it comes down to functionality and actual usage, all Numark products suck. Don't even get me started on that damn TTX1 and how much wow and flutter is has over any given 1200 model.

Numark mixers?

The virtual vinyl (serato killer)? othing more than a skinned build of the latest version of PCDJ.

Brian · June 2006

i guarantee those jog wheels break faster than numark's mixers already do
i just don't think you can have nearly the same control over your shit with this stuff compared to vinyl, serato, or cdjs. if it seemed practical at all i would be all for it (beyond the fact that it's corny as fuck) but i just don't see it being practical at all. also, why the fuck do you need two ipods for this shit?

twoply · June 2006

For the millionth time:

They have no pitch control, so every "mix" will be a trainwreck.

Who wants to buy TWO ipods? (for that white one on the left)

Does that darker model pictured on the banner work off of one?

Unfortunately dun, the black one (IDJ2) has pitch control and will play two songs simultaneously from a single iPod.

I say unfortunately because these features are just enough to foll some idiots into buying inferior Numark quality shit. It all looks good on paper, but when it comes down to putting down a mix, I doubt anything produced from an iDj2 will be that

it's a fucking Numark. On paper[/b] EVERYTHING Numark makes is better than the top brands, but when it comes down to functionality and actual usage, all Numark products suck. Don't even get me started on that damn TTX1 and how much wow and flutter is has over any given 1200 model.

Numark mixers?

The virtual vinyl (serato killer)? othing more than a skinned build of the latest version of PCDJ.

Agreed. The quality of Numark's products has to be taken into account. They just suck. Period.

I'm curious, though, does Serato support lossless? It seems like that would make it far more appealing, considering most mainstream p2ps usually provide 128 kbps or worse.

Imperial_Mao · June 2006

also, why the fuck do you need two ipods for this shit?

You don't anymore, can play two MP3s off the same iPod at the same time...

Fatback · June 2006

i have absolutely no idea why anyone would want to buy technics and spend thousands on records when their collection can already be completely contained on a mini hard drive, even if that shit is corny as a muufuckah

sound quality

unlascivious · June 2006

i collect records because i enjoy it.

the sonic quality difference is virtually indistinguishable between digital music at a high sample rate and an analog signal. besides, the vast majority of music today is produced digitally making any records put out today just as inferior as cd's.

again, for the average kid who already has an ipod, a digital music library, and the desire to be a bar mitzvah superstar, this set-up isn't so bad.

whether the components are decent quality is a different story and we'll all have to wait and see.

Community

iPod + IDJ2 versus Vinyl + Technics 1210s

Comments