Ebay buyers who must win every auction they bid on
Manduro3000
265 Posts
You know these people. They bid very high amounts on everything to secure a win, even if it means paying triple the value of the item. What is the possible benefit from doing this besides being able to see your name as the winner in all your completed auctions? Am I the only person out there who thinks this behavier is retarded?
Comments
The buyer that bothers me way more are the ones that bid substantially higher than anyone else and refuse payment on a (0) feedback account. Drives me nuts. I have been burnt so many times that I refuse bids from anyone under (10) feedback now.
Feelin ya.
Blame the underbidders who bid extra high and still lose, pushing the price up. I mean, if the issue is out of control prices, then the bidder who ends up winning isn't the only one responsible. Takes two. And if you've been number two then... mirror.
I thought it was about winning too, but I seen these ebay bidders over bid on records where there were exact same copies available as buy-it-now for less money. Explain that?
I know that a lot of bidders buy from more trusted sellers. Even if the buy it now is cheaper. There is greater chance to get a better grade copy from someone that is a veteran when it comes to vinyl even if the grading is the same on both records. This weekend I bought a record from someone that said the record was one condition and I had to debate back and forth to find out that they were grading on a different scale then I was. FRUSTRATING! I would rather buy from a trusted seller then from a novice.
Ebay uses the second-price sealed-bid model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auction_theory
Look, if you play the eBay game long enough and you place high bids on every record you bid on, chances are, some stuff will go high, but also many things will go for far less than "normal".
You gotta know how to play the game and what to bid on.
Interesting read! This part made me realise why i always get outbid in the last minute:
"...Substituting into , ??? ap + (ap ??? p)a = 0 or ??? p + (a ??? 1)p = 0. Solving for a yields . Therefore satisfies . implies , or . Thus, the (unique) Nash equilibrium strategy bidding function of this game is established as , at least within the set of invertible bidding functions. "