Solaris?

paulnicepaulnice 924 Posts
edited August 2006 in Strut Central
Anyone seen this Solaris remake w/Clooney?It's just about the only Soderbergh flick I haven't seen.I held off only because of the constant bad word-of-mouth, but it's been playing on IFC lately.Is it worth the time?

  Comments


  • twoplytwoply Only Built 4 Manzanita Links 2,914 Posts
    Have you seen the original? If not, that's the one to see.

    I tried watching the remake, but ten minutes or so into the movie I heard The Insane Clown Posse playing in the background. I chose not to watch any further.

  • mannybolonemannybolone Los Angeles, CA 15,025 Posts

    Anyone seen this Solaris remake w/Clooney?
    It's just about the only Soderbergh flick I haven't seen.
    I held off only because of the constant bad word-of-mouth, but it's been playing on IFC lately.
    Is it worth the time?

    Paul: in short, no.

    As far as Soderbergh films, it's better than, say, "Oceans 12" but to me, the film never really came together in a compelling way - not narratively, not visually. I haven't seen the original however.

  • I liked it.

    The original put me to sleep. It was too long and Russian for me.

  • JimsterJimster Cruffiton.etsy.com 6,954 Posts


    ...and I like Soderbergh and Clooney in a non-ayo way.

    Ocean's 12 > Solaris > Anything on God's Earth > "Cube".

  • theory9theory9 1,128 Posts


    ...and I like Soderbergh and Clooney in a non-ayo way.

    O'Shea Jackson >Ocean's 12 > Solaris > Anything on God's Earth > "Cube".

  • piedpiperpiedpiper 1,279 Posts
    Have you seen the original? If not, that's the one to see.

  • tuneuptuneup 586 Posts
    This is an incredible film...

    As a direct opposite to most, I truly fell asleep trying to watch the original (and i was even dedicated to giving it a try). Clooney version is incredibly on point for me. I thought that the idea that was presented in the original film was properly laid out in the later version. Aside from that, the Soundtrack is one of my favorite pieces of music in a long time. A must have!!!!!!!!!!

  • I enjoyed it...not the best film ever but a pleasant way to kill a damp sunday afternoon.

  • DocMcCoyDocMcCoy "Go and laugh in your own country!" 5,917 Posts

    Anyone seen this Solaris remake w/Clooney?
    It's just about the only Soderbergh flick I haven't seen.
    I held off only because of the constant bad word-of-mouth, but it's been playing on IFC lately.
    Is it worth the time?

    I think it depends on how you feel about the Tarkovsky original. The Soderbergh/Clooney one is like a condensed version of the o.g. - essentially, it follows the same plot/dramatic arc and deals with the same themes, but it takes about an hour less to do so. I think they're both good, but in different ways - I kind of like the glacial pace of the Tarkovsky, but Soderbergh's take is probably a little easier to engage with. I think a lot of the criticism it got was based on the perception that Clooney was getting a little above himself by trying to make an "art" movie.

  • noznoz 3,625 Posts
    the Soundtrack is one of my favorite pieces of music in a long time. A must have!!!!!!!!!!

    Insane Clown Posse


  • erewhonerewhon 1,123 Posts
    Coincidentally, I just finished reading the Stanislaw Lem novel, which is the shit. It goes into so much more scientific and philosphical detail than the Tarkovsy film. Not to take anything away from that masterpiece, but it is just amazing how completely Lem articulates his vision in the book. It's not just one of the those Psi-Fi adaptations that takes a seed of a good idea from the book.

    Can't say I'm that interested in the Clooney/Soderbergh version.

  • CousinLarryCousinLarry 4,618 Posts
    Coincidentally, I just finished reading the Stanislaw Lem novel, which is the shit. It goes into so much more scientific and philosphical detail than the Tarkovsy film. Not to take anything away from that masterpiece, but it is just amazing how completely Lem articulates his vision in the book. It's not just one of the those Psi-Fi adaptations that takes a seed of a good idea from the book.


    This sounds good. My reading list is getting really long though.

  • paulnicepaulnice 924 Posts
    Thanks all.
    I just got my Tivo back from the shop last night so it won't hurt to grab it off IFC at some point.
    I've been in a thoughtful sci-fi mood as of late. Mostly 70s stuff though.
    Soylent Green, Omega Man, Westworld, Futureworld.
    Never did see Silent Running, which is something I've been trying to catch since I had a subscription to Omni, Starlog and Famous Monsters.

  • aleitaleit 1,915 Posts
    skip soderburgh and see tarkovsky.

    and while you're at it, i highly suggest the following:
    andrei rublev
    the stalker

    tarkovsky is one of my favorite directors of all time.
    the cinematography in his films is brilliant.
    granted it is not light movie-watching and it's a heavy time commitment
    but unlike much russian film of the time- rooted in montage or socialist realism- tarkovsky was doing something revolutionary (or counter-revolutionary depending on your vantage point, i.e. his films were banned for a long time).

    in any case, i didn't hate soderburgh's version but can't say i liked it.

  • twoplytwoply Only Built 4 Manzanita Links 2,914 Posts
    Coincidentally, I just finished reading the Stanislaw Lem novel, which is the shit. It goes into so much more scientific and philosphical detail than the Tarkovsy film. Not to take anything away from that masterpiece, but it is just amazing how completely Lem articulates his vision in the book. It's not just one of the those Psi-Fi adaptations that takes a seed of a good idea from the book.

    Can't say I'm that interested in the Clooney/Soderbergh version.


    The book is great, I've read it a few times and I still feel like I've barely scratched the surface. Lem is an excellent authour in genreal. I also recommend The Investigation.

    And Aleit's Tarkovsky recommendations are on point. Stalker is one of my all-time favorites. It can be hard to take in much of the plot (or ideas contained therin) the first time you see it, as it's so visually stunning.

  • CahootsCahoots 378 Posts
    -

  • edith headedith head 5,106 Posts
    i didn't like it. *** (semi spoiler) *** there is a love scene in there where clooney's ass is all illuminated as if the camera was fawning over it that had me rolling my eyes.

    semi-related, i think the original solaris poster is beautiful and i stoleded it recently for a mixtape cover


  • skip soderburgh and see tarkovsky.

    succinct.

    if you can spare two hours for mediocre, you can definitely utilize 2 and a half for brilliant.

    tarkovsky never made a wrong move. 'the sacrifice' and 'the mirror' being my personal choices. the chris marker biopic of tarkovsky also essential if you're into him.

  • batmonbatmon 27,574 Posts
    OG SOLARIS =

    My sci-fi buddy perfers the Clooney version. I havent seen it yet.

  • aleitaleit 1,915 Posts
    skip soderburgh and see tarkovsky.

    succinct.

    if you can spare two hours for mediocre, you can definitely utilize 2 and a half for brilliant.

    tarkovsky never made a wrong move. 'the sacrifice' and 'the mirror' being my personal choices. the chris marker biopic of tarkovsky also essential if you're into him.

    the mirror is cool.
    i also like his earlier stuff which is pretty different- my name is ivan, etc.
    his book "sculpting in time" is dope.
    will have to check out the chris marker flick.

  • bassiebassie 11,710 Posts
    skip soderburgh and see tarkovsky.

    succinct.

    if you can spare two hours for mediocre, you can definitely utilize 2 and a half for brilliant.

    tarkovsky never made a wrong move. 'the sacrifice' and 'the mirror' being my personal choices. the chris marker biopic of tarkovsky also essential if you're into him.

    co-signature...The Sacrifice is
Sign In or Register to comment.