›

why TINA BROOKS true blue so expensive?

youngEINSTEINyoungEINSTEIN 2,443 Posts
edited July 2006 in Strut Central
anyone? i could kick myself for passing on a vg+ copy for $40 a few years back.peace, stein. . .

  Comments

  • FatbackFatback 6,746 Posts
    Enter this world at your own risk.

  • On_the_Red_ClayOn_the_Red_Clay 1,728 Posts
    Not a lot of copies pressed and no demand for represses for a few decades; most early blue note titles were in print as long as there was demand.
  • SonicReducerSonicReducer 421 Posts
    Not a lot of copies pressed and no demand for represses for a few decades; most early blue note titles were in print as long as there was demand.

    Definately. The OG mono is really a rare record. I didn't think so until I sold my beater copy on the big screen for $300. I even put in the listing it had a feeler mark that skipped and graded it G-. The cover was nice though. It's a record that has been sought after since pretty much the beginning of jazz record collecting, staying up there in dollars despite taste changes and a modern re-issue. It's also a damn good record.

    SONIC
  • funky16cornersfunky16corners 7,175 Posts
    It's also a damn good record.

Sign In or Register to comment.