Alan Lomax gets checked (whitey related)

FatbackFatback 6,746 Posts
edited August 2005 in Strut Central
August 29, 2005 NYTimes
Book Says Alan Lomax Neglected Black Scholars
By MARC WEINGARTEN
A new book asserts that the American folklorist Alan Lomax gave short shrift to the work of black scholars who accompanied him on now legendary trips to the Mississippi Delta to record seminal blues artists like Muddy Waters.

Lomax's recordings for the Library of Congress, made during his travels through the South in the 1930's and 40's, make up perhaps the greatest repository of American vernacular music ever compiled.

But he was not alone on some of those trips. Three African-American scholars from Fisk University in Nashville, a black college founded in 1865 to educate newly freed slaves, accompanied him on two pivotal trips to Coahoma County in Mississippi in 1941 and 1942. And they continued to work on the project after Lomax left the Library of Congress. But Lomax, in his critically praised 1993 memoir, "The Land Where the Blues Began" (Pantheon Books), gives the three only a few cursory mentions, one in the acknowledgments. In the memoir, Lomax, who died in 2002, also conflates the two Coahoma County trips into a single trip.

In the new book, "Lost Delta Found" (Vanderbilt University Press), the editors, Robert Gordon and Bruce Nemerov try to set the record straight by publishing the long-forgotten manuscripts of the Fisk scholars: John W. Work III, a composer and musicologist; Lewis Wade Jones, a sociologist; and Samuel C. Adams Jr., a graduate student. Mr. Gordon and Mr. Nemerov say these manuscripts provide a more balanced picture of the Coahoma County research as well as a more nuanced analysis of the Jim Crow South than is to be found in Lomax's memoir.

Published with the three Fisk manuscripts are 158 songs transcribed by Work, ranging from the familiar ("Shoo Fly," "Shortnin' Bread") to the whimsically obscure ("Stuball," "I Am a Funny Little Dutch Girl").

"Work's transcriptions show us that Mississippi wasn't only about the blues," said Mr. Nemerov, a former audio specialist at the Center for Popular Music at Middle Tennessee State University, who unearthed about two-thirds of Work's hand-written manuscript at Fisk University in 1989 and wrote about it in The Tennessee Folklore Society Bulletin. "There are children's songs and other social songs that serve no purpose other than for neighbors to entertain each other."

According to "Lost Delta Found," it was Work, the leader of the Fisk research team, who initiated the Mississippi study when he applied to the Library of Congress for money to support a recording trip to Natchez. Alerted to Work's interest in Southern vernacular music, Lomax, who ran the library's Archive of American Song, entered the picture and, Mr. Gordon and Mr. Nemerov say, diverted the project to Coahoma. Once the team arrived in Coahoma, they were told of a blues singer who worked as a farmhand on Col. Howard Stovall's plantation. That farmhand turned out to be McKinley Morganfield, a k a Muddy Waters.

Lomax wrote extensively of the Coahoma Country trips in "The Land Where the Blues Began," published long after the fact, but the research was supposed to have been jointly published some five decades earlier by Fisk University and the Library of Congress. The Fisk scholars' manuscripts were somehow lost after they were sent to the Library of Congress in 1943 by Work, who died in 1967, and have been published for the first time in "Lost Delta Found."

"Lost Delta Found" is an outgrowth of Mr. Gordon's research for his 2002 biography "Can't Be Satisfied: The Life and Times of Muddy Waters" (Little, Brown). Tipped off in the late 1990's by Mr. Nemerov to Work's contributions, Mr. Gordon sifted through Lomax's vast archive at Hunter College in New York, where, after much burrowing, he found a manuscript stuffed in the back of a file cabinet in a powder-blue cover with Lewis Wade Jones's name on it. Also written on the cover were the words "Property of Fisk University." When Mr. Gordon matched up the document to the incomplete, hand-written manuscript that Mr. Nemerov had unearthed, he knew he had discovered a significant contribution to Southern folkloric scholarship.

The document was a revelation to Mr. Gordon, describing in vivid detail the ways Coahoma County's residents worked, played and practiced religion. He said Work's manuscript, in particular, is a crucial primer on the region's musical practices, from sermons to children's songs - his careful academic analysis leavened with interviews with the county's citizens.

"To me, Work is important because he's an academic who sees the value of homegrown, vernacular material," Mr. Gordon said. "Most academics were ashamed of that."

Work went into the Coahoma County project with an open mind, Mr. Gordon added. Unlike Lomax, Work took note of well-spoken blacks who owned land, and the fact that spirituals were already on the wane in certain parts of Mississippi - both of which ran counter to Lomax's assumptions about the Southern black man, Mr. Gordon said.

"That's the biggest difference between Work's assessment of the South and Lomax's evaluations in his own book," Mr. Gordon said. "One documented what was there, the other focused on what he'd expected to find. Lomax was disappointed to discover that blacks owned land, because it didn't conform to his vision of the South."

According to the book, Lomax used a photograph of a sharecropper's cabin in his book without giving proper credit to Work. The picture was found in the manuscript of Mr. Adams, the Fisk graduate student. Asked to comment on "Lost Delta Found," Ellen Harold, an editor and translator at the Alan Lomax Archive at Hunter College and Mr. Lomax's niece, said, "I feel the book makes claims and innuendoes that are ridiculous."

"Work wasn't neglected," she added. "Perhaps he would have been a greater folklorist had he had more support. But he had a tenured position at Fisk as chairman of the music department, and Alan never had an academic position. I just don't see him as much of a victim. Gordon and Nemerov claim that Alan used a photograph of Work's that wasn't credited, but I don't see how they can say with certainty that it was Work's."

Ms. Harold said she believed that Work had a copy of the manuscript all along, but never bothered to have it published. "My sense is that Work wasn't the most organized person," she said. "He requested the manuscript from the Library of Congress in 1958, and the correspondence from the Library doesn't indicate in any way that the manuscript had been lost or misplaced. He had 20 years to write about the project; he just never did."

Ms. Harold said she did not know how the Fisk manuscript wound up in Mr. Lomax's archive.

Regardless of the murky circumstances surrounding the mysterious loss and re-appearance of the Fisk research, Mr. Gordon said he hoped that "Lost Delta Found" would draw people to Work's scholarship.

"It's really beautiful work," said Mr. Gordon, "and there's a lot more of it." Mr. Gordon and Mr. Nemerov would like to publish a second volume of Work's essays and speeches.

As for Lomax and his legacy, Mr. Gordon is of two minds.

"I still believe that Lomax was a great folklorist," Mr. Gordon said. "But I do wonder why he had so much trouble acknowledging his peers, especially given the fact that they were African-American.[/b] Why would he miss that opportunity?"

  Comments


  • hcrinkhcrink 8,729 Posts
    I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument, but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due? He probably would not have given credit to his collaborators had they been white, but who knows...

  • i have read Lomax's books and i do see how he could have elaborated on several of the journeys and specifics involved with the trips/research/recordings. But, the same could be said for every detail of "The Land Where The Blues Began". It was a book just detailed enough to provide a setting and a point of reference as well as act as an introductory level "who's who" of delta blues. It was rather vague on several fronts and i think that is where this angled perspective is kind of getting twisted. He never once understated or belittled the involvment of the Fisk crew in any of his books. He clearly states how important they were in the trips, not only for there knowledge and research expertise, but for there risky willingness to explore the delta (as African Americans) with a regionaly unknown white man.

    honestly, it seems like this article was written (cleverly at that) to serve as a promotional tool for the upcoming book.

    the new guy,
    gabe


  • GuzzoGuzzo 8,611 Posts
    I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument
    I can see it coming from miles away


    but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due?

    exactly. Use caution before throwing around accusations of racism

  • FatbackFatback 6,746 Posts
    i have read Lomax's books and i do see how he could have elaborated on several of the journeys and specifics involved with the trips/research/recordings. But, the same could be said for every detail of "The Land Where The Blues Began". It was a book just detailed enough to provide a setting and a point of reference as well as act as an introductory level "who's who" of delta blues. It was rather vague on several fronts and i think that is where this angled perspective is kind of getting twisted. He never once understated or belittled the involvment of the Fisk crew in any of his books. He clearly states how important they were in the trips, not only for there knowledge and research expertise, but for there risky willingness to explore the delta (as African Americans) with a regionaly unknown white man.

    honestly, it seems like this article was written (cleverly at that) to serve as a promotional tool for the upcoming book.

    the new guy,
    gabe


    well said. i agree that the article smacks of veiled promotion.


    welcome new guy

  • FatbackFatback 6,746 Posts
    I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument
    I can see it coming from miles away



    but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due?

    exactly. Use caution before throwing around accusations of racism

    shut up faggit

  • GuzzoGuzzo 8,611 Posts
    I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument
    I can see it coming from miles away



    but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due?

    exactly. Use caution before throwing around accusations of racism

    shut up faggit

    one day we will kiss and you'll be sorry


  • I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument
    I can see it coming from miles away



    but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due?

    exactly. Use caution before throwing around accusations of racism

    shut up faggit

    one day we will kiss and you'll be sorry


    I think that's true, but not for the reasons you seem to be implying...

    PS Read the recent Muddy Waters bio for a pretty good explanation of the huge contribution of the Fisk guys to Lomax's research. I heard that Nemerov guy on NPR last year bitching about Lomax. I don't remember any mention of a book at the time.

  • GrafwritahGrafwritah 4,184 Posts
    I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument, but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due? He probably would not have given credit to his collaborators had they been white, but who knows...

    I think that's typical 'big dog' modus operandi. What a shithead.


  • hcrinkhcrink 8,729 Posts
    I know this will be turned into a BIG racial argument, but really, how unusual is it for someone of Lomax's stature to not give credit where credit is due? He probably would not have given credit to his collaborators had they been white, but who knows...

    I think that's typical 'big dog' modus operandi. What a shithead.


    exactly. I'm not saying Lomax was in no way a racist. He might have been. but, I'd be equally unsurprised if he had overlooked the help of white men he viewed as underlings.

  • white_teawhite_tea 3,262 Posts
    My man Rob Elder wrote about this last week in the Chicago Tribune.

    Did a missing document cost a man his place in music history?[/b]

    By Robert K. Elder
    Chicago Tribune

    Even when he found the manuscript jammed into the back of a filing cabinet, author Robert Gordon didn???t recognize exactly what he had unearthed.
    Wrapped in a powder-blue cover, it was a long-lost piece of blues history: the 1941-1942 field study manuscript that chronicles African-American music and culture in rural Mississippi. Adding to its historical mystique, the manuscript documents the discovery of blues legend Muddy Waters by Library of Congress folklorist Alan Lomax and musicologist John Work III, a professor at Fisk University in Nashville.

    Sixty years ago, the original field study findings were meant to be jointly edited and published by the Library of Congress and Fisk University, a predominantly African-American liberal arts institution. But Work???s manuscript was mishandled, lost, found, lost again and, eventually, forgotten.

    Decades later, Lomax wrote "Land Where the Blues Began," a prize-winning book that drew on his recollections of Mississippi Delta trips. Work was mentioned only three times in the volume.

    This month, Vanderbilt University Press is releasing "Lost Delta Found: Rediscovering the Fisk University-Library of Congress Coahoma County Study, 1941-1942," as written by Work, plus essays by his colleagues Lewis Wade Jones and Samuel C. Adams, who also took part in the research.

    With the book???s publication, editors Gordon and Bruce Nemerov are attempting to shed light on the famed ethno-music research and recast the contributions of Work.

    "It???s justice. What we???re doing is justice," Gordon says. "A guy who had incredible impact on these famous field trips who has been completely written out of them."

    "Lost Delta Found" also conjures up contentious issues about race, the interpretation of history and protection of legacies.

    Matthew Barton, who worked for Lomax for seven years in the 1980s and is now employed at the Library of Congress, applauds the publication of "Lost Delta Found." He has some concerns about treatment of Lomax in the book???s introduction, however.

    "I???m just worried that people will get the wrong impression from their introduction," Barton says. "They cast (Lomax) in a rather negative light, as someone who was undermining John Work."

    The "Lost Delta Found" editors attest that Work???s contributions to the trips were all but ignored by Lomax. It???s a view Work???s son, John Work IV, supports.

    "There have been so many African-American artists or scholars of one sort or another that have either been discounted or hidden or just left out of the mainstream. From my viewpoint, this was a perfect example of that," says Work, a retired economist and author of "Race, Economics and Corporate America."

    "I was delighted to see this come to light and see my father get credit for the substantial work he did," Work says. "I do believe that Robert and Bruce did some great historiography here. They simply lay down the facts instead of editorializing. Those guys are detectives of the first order, as I see it."

    However, while neither Gordon nor Nemerov explicitly lay blame on Lomax for the manuscript???s disappearance, implications permeate their introduction.

    They write that the bound manuscript "a noncirculating original, was found stashed in the back of a file cabinet drawer in the Alan Lomax Archives. ... (It) had a soft powder-blue cover identifying it as the product of, and the property of ... Fisk University. It has since been returned."

    "They use very loaded language. They are making conjectures, there is no evidence for any of this," says Ellen Harold, Lomax???s niece by marriage, editor and Italian translator at the Alan Lomax Archives in New York???s Hunter College.

    "They said he had the manuscript. It was lost repeatedly, by other people. That was not Lomax???s fault," Harold says. "He preserved it, and he also preserved Work???s recordings of black fiddle music."

    Ronald D. Cohen, editor of "Alan Lomax: Selected Writings, 1934-1997" and history professor at Indiana University Northwest has been a longtime Lomax defender. As Cohen read the book, he wrote a response e-mail to the Chicago Tribune.

    "It appears their main complaint against Lomax is that he did not credit Work with initiating the project (or even being part of it) in ???Land Where the Blues Began??? ...," Cohen writes. "Gordon has much good to say about Lomax???s importance, but wants to give most of the credit to Work and his colleagues. I think this is probably most correct. Lomax was never one to share much of the credit."

    As for the manuscript, Harold says, it???s unclear exactly when it became "lost." Work wrote the Library of Congress in 1958, Harold says, asking for permission to include his work from the Coahoma study in a book he was planning to write - though he never did.

    "Nothing in the letter or in the reply from the Library of Congress indicates that his essay was missing at that time, and it seems reasonable to assume that he had a copy in his possession," Barton says.

    Lomax, however, released his own account of the journey, "The Land Where the Blues Began," in 1993. It won the National Book Critics Circle Award, though it drew criticism for condensing the two trips into one. He mentions Work in the volume three times, including an entry in the acknowledgments.

    Cohen points out that "Land Where the Blues Began" is "Lomax???s story about his life and knowledge, and not about other scholars. I guess this is to be expected."

    As for how the Work manuscript ended up in Lomax???s archives at Hunter College, Fisk librarian Jessie Carnie Smith draws a blank.

    "I just can???t tell you how that got out," Smith says.

    "The Gordon/Nemerov book is most fascinating and also does not seem to stress too much the Muddy Waters connection," Cohen says. "They seem most interested in publishing for the first time these fascinating documents, which are certainly welcomed."

    "Alan would love that this is out now," Harold adds. "I feel it???s a shame to pit them against each other because each one had their good qualities, whatever disagreements they had. They were on the right side together, on music???s side."

  • faux_rillzfaux_rillz 14,343 Posts
    Ha! T***a e-mailed me this article this morning and as soon as I read it I thought "This has Fatback written all over it"!

  • FatbackFatback 6,746 Posts
    i'm restraining myself after my affirmative action tirade.

  • GrafwritahGrafwritah 4,184 Posts
    i'm restraining myself after my affirmative action tirade.

    whatever whitey
Sign In or Register to comment.